فصل
فأعد النظر في نفسك وتأمل حكمة اللطيف الخبير في تركيب البدن
Question: Is this a hadith? Is it authentic?
Narrated by Anas Ibn Malik "I heard from the Apostle of Allah (Peace and blessing be upon him) that he said "Allah was satan in the form of an angel that revealed to me the verses and his book the Quran and I' am his prophet.(Umdah al-Ahkam:Vol.3,Hadith no.460)
رواه أنس ابن مالك "سمعت من رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم أنه" كان الله شيطان في شكل ملاك كشف لي الآيات وكتابه القرآن وأنا نبي .
Answer:
Praise be to God.
There is no such a hadith in any book. It's a fabrication of desperate missionaries to deceive Muslims.
Umdat Al Ahkam itself in one volume and Hadith no.460 is shown below:
![]() | |
| Umdah al-Ahkam:Hadith no.460 |
(The book can be found here)
Here is the translation of the Hadith no.460:
وَفِي رِوَايَةٍ: ((لا يَقْضِيَنَّ حَكِمٌ بَيْنَ اثْنَيْنِ وَهُوَ غَضْبَانُ)) .
and in another version "No judge must give judgment between two people when he is angry.”
That's the real hadith and it has nothing to do with the fabrication of missionaries.
And Allah knows best.
A man manumitted a slave and he had no other property than that, so the Prophet (ﷺ) canceled the manumission (and sold the slave for him). Nu'aim bin Al-Nahham bought the slave from him.
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 9, Book 85, Hadith 80
Bukhari » (Statements made under) Coercion - كتاب الإكراه » Hadith 6947
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 8, Book 79, Hadith 707
Narrated `Amr:Jabir said:
An Ansari man made his slave a Mudabbar and he had no other property than him. When the Prophet (ﷺ) heard of that, he said (to his companions), "Who wants to buy him (i.e., the slave) for me?" Nu'aim bin An-Nahham bought him for eight hundred Dirhams. I heard Jabir saying, "That was a coptic slave who died in the same year."
Most of the Arabs had complied with the call of Ishmael (Peace be
upon him) , and professed the religion of his father Abraham (Peace be
upon him) They had worshipped Allah, professed His Oneness and followed His religion a long time until they forgot part of what they had been reminded of.
This hadith was narrated by Abu Dawood (4410) and an-Nasa’i (4978), and it is a munkar hadith that is not authentic.
An-Nasa’i said after its narration: “This hadith is munkar, and Musab bin Thabit is not strong in the hadith.” End.
The majority of jurists did not accept this hadith due to its weakness, and because it is possible that this man apostatized, and for this reason he was killed and thrown into the well.
Sindi said: "The jurists doesn't apply what's mentioned here; it was said: he found him an apostate which is the reason for killing him . Such a humiliation, is not befitting the condition of a Muslim.” End.
هذا الحديث رواه أبو داود (4410)، والنسائي (4978)، وهو حديث منكر لا يصح.
قال النسائي بعد روايته: "وَهَذَا حَدِيثٌ مُنْكَرٌ، وَمُصْعَبُ بْنُ ثَابِتٍ لَيْسَ بِالْقَوِيِّ فِي الْحَدِيثِ" انتهى.
ولم يأخذ جمهور الفقهاء بهذا الحديث لضعفه، ولأنه يحتمل أن هذا الرجل ارتد، ولهذا قتل، وألقي في البئر.
قال السندي: " وَالْفُقَهَاء على خِلَافه، فَقيل لَعَلَّه وجد مِنْهُ ارتدادا أوجب قَتله . وَهَذَا الِاحْتِمَال أوفق بِمَا فِي حَدِيث جَابر : أَنهم جروه ، وألقوه فِي الْبِئْر ؛ إِذْ الْمُؤمن وان ارْتكب كَبِيرَة ، فَإِنَّهُ يقبر وَيصلى عَلَيْهِ ، لَا سِيمَا بعد إِقَامَة الْحَد وتطهيره . وَأما الإهانة بِهَذَا الْوَجْه : فَلَا تلِيق بِحَال الْمُسلم" انتهى.
Abu ‘Umar Hafs al-Duri (died 246AH) was one of the great reciters of his time and one of the transmitters of the seven qiraa’aat, both for the qiraa’ah of Abu ‘Amr (al-Duri ‘an Abi ‘Amr) and al-Kisaa’i (al-Duri ‘an al-Kisaa’i). He was also a hadith narrator and a contemporary of Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and Imam Ahmad relayed hadith from al-Duri. Despite this, the muhaddith al-Daraqutni graded al-Duri as dha’eef, or weak. In his biographical entry on al-Duri, Imam Shams al-Deen al-Dhahabi commented on this by writing:
وقول الدارقطني : ضعيف ، يريد في ضبط الآثار ، أما في القراءات فثبت إمام . وكذلك جماعة من القراء أثبات في القراءة دون الحديث ، كنافع ، والكسائي ، وحفص ; فإنهم نهضوا بأعباء الحروف وحرروها ، ولم يصنعوا ذلك في الحديث ، كما أن طائفة من الحفاظ أتقنوا الحديث ، ولم يحكموا القراءة . وكذا شأن كل من برز في فن ، ولم يعتن بما عداه . والله أعلم . ـ
"When al-Daraqutni said that al-Duri was dha’eef, he was referring to his precision in hadith narrations. However when it came to the qiraa’aat, then he was reliable and a leading figure.
This was also the case for a number of the famous reciters, that they were reliable narrators of a qiraa’ah but not of hadith. Examples include Naafi’, al-Kisaa’i, and Hafs. That is because they devoted themselves to the heavy task of the Qur’anic words with great care and precision, while they did not expend that same level of exertion regarding the hadith.
Likewise, there are a segment of the hadith experts who excel in hadith while not perfecting their recitation.
This is the way for anyone who excels in one area without focusing on other areas. And Allah knows best."
[Siyar A’laam al-Nubalaa’ 11/543]
Fallacies time-stamp
23:30 fallacy of appeal to irrelevent authority
31:08 fallacy of equivocation
31:54 fallacy of cherry picking
36:10 appeal to emotion
38:00 hammer wood reference 🤣
49:43 moving the goal post
1:14:42 faulty analogy
1:28:58 circular reasoning
1:42:00 fallacy of equivocation (extended)
1:48:00 ad populum
:57:05 appeal to mystery
2:03:58 hasty generalization
2:08:56 Q&A begins
2:09:06 1st guest - mathematics and physics
2:46:07 2nd guest - chevalier du christ
3:10:14 3rd guest - david
3:41:04 4th guest - george kefaloukos
4:00:00 5th guest - Adam F.
4:12:22 6th guest- H
4:20:18 7th guest - dragon
4:26:35 8th guest - kevin
4:32:59 9th guest - kais
4:52:33 10th, 11th & 12th guest -waqas ahmad, ONE DAWAH & Mohammad Rashid