Tuesday 28 December 2021

Some of the Famous Reciters Weak Narrators?! Imam al-Dhahabi

Abu ‘Umar Hafs al-Duri (died 246AH) was one of the great reciters of his time and one of the transmitters of the seven qiraa’aat, both for the qiraa’ah of Abu ‘Amr (al-Duri ‘an Abi ‘Amr) and al-Kisaa’i (al-Duri ‘an al-Kisaa’i). He was also a hadith narrator and a contemporary of Ahmad ibn Hanbal, and Imam Ahmad relayed hadith from al-Duri. Despite this, the muhaddith al-Daraqutni graded al-Duri as dha’eef, or weak. In his biographical entry on al-Duri, Imam Shams al-Deen al-Dhahabi commented on this by writing:

وقول الدارقطني : ضعيف ، يريد في ضبط الآثار ، أما في القراءات فثبت إمام . وكذلك جماعة من القراء أثبات في القراءة دون الحديث ، كنافع ، والكسائي ، وحفص ; فإنهم نهضوا بأعباء الحروف وحرروها ، ولم يصنعوا ذلك في الحديث ، كما أن طائفة من الحفاظ أتقنوا الحديث ، ولم يحكموا القراءة . وكذا شأن كل من برز في فن ، ولم يعتن بما عداه . والله أعلم . ـ

"When al-Daraqutni said that al-Duri was dha’eef, he was referring to his precision in hadith narrations. However when it came to the qiraa’aat, then he was reliable and a leading figure.

This was also the case for a number of the famous reciters, that they were reliable narrators of a qiraa’ah but not of hadith. Examples include Naafi’, al-Kisaa’i, and Hafs. That is because they devoted themselves to the heavy task of the Qur’anic words with great care and precision, while they did not expend that same level of exertion regarding the hadith.

Likewise, there are a segment of the hadith experts who excel in hadith while not perfecting their recitation.

This is the way for anyone who excels in one area without focusing on other areas. And Allah knows best."

[Siyar A’laam al-Nubalaa’ 11/543]


Source

Sunday 14 February 2021

Logical fallacies of missionaries when they discuss with Muslims



Fallacies time-stamp
 

 23:30 fallacy of appeal to irrelevent authority 

 31:08 fallacy of equivocation  

31:54 fallacy of cherry picking 

 36:10 appeal to emotion  

38:00 hammer wood reference 🤣 

 49:43 moving the goal post 

 1:14:42 faulty analogy  

1:28:58 circular reasoning  

1:42:00 fallacy of equivocation (extended) 

 1:48:00 ad populum 

 :57:05 appeal to mystery 

 2:03:58 hasty generalization 

  2:08:56 Q&A begins 

  2:09:06 1st guest - mathematics and physics 

 2:46:07 2nd guest - chevalier du christ 

 3:10:14 3rd guest - david 

 3:41:04 4th guest - george kefaloukos 

 4:00:00 5th guest - Adam F.

  4:12:22 6th guest- H 

 4:20:18 7th guest - dragon 

 4:26:35 8th guest - kevin 

 4:32:59 9th guest - kais 

 4:52:33 10th, 11th & 12th guest -waqas ahmad, ONE DAWAH & Mohammad Rashid

Friday 22 January 2021

Medical Benefits from Circumcision

 Circumcision should be offered ‘like vaccines’ to the parents of baby boys, new study :
https://islamicnafahat.wordpress.co...ccines-to-the-parents-of-baby-boys-new-study/

It reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%.
https://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/

American Academy of Pediatrics: Benefits of Circumcision Outweigh Risks
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/27/...sion-outweigh-risks-pediatric-group-says.html

Medical Benefits from Circumcision
by Dr. Brian J. Morris
from Circ-Online




Circumcision has historically been a topic of emotive and often irrational debate. At least part of the reason is that a sex organ is involved. (Compare, for example, ear piercing.) During the past two decades the medical profession have tended to advise parents not to circumcise their baby boys. In fact there have even been reports of harrassment by medical professionals of new mothers, especially those belonging to religious groups that practice circumcision, in an attempt to stop them having this procedure carried out. Such attitudes are a far cry from the situation years ago when baby boys were circumcised routinely in Australia. But over the past 20 years the rate has declined to as low as 10%.

However, a reversal of this trend is starting to occur. In the light of an increasing volume of medical scientific evidence (many publications cited below) pointing to the benefits of neonatal circumcision a new policy statement was formulated by a working party of the Australian College of Paediatrics in August 1995 and adopted by the College in May 1996 [2] . In this document medical practitioners are now urged to fully inform parents of the benefits of having their male children circumcised. Similar recommendations were made recently by the Canadian Paediatric Society who also conducted an evaluation of the literature, although concluded that the benefits and harms were very evenly balanced. As discussed below the American College of Pediatrics has moved far closer to an advocacy position.

Monday 11 January 2021

Are we Born Believers in God?

 This episode discusses the first innate component in human beings which is religiosity. 

What is religiosity?

 Where does it come from? 

Is the belief in a Creator innate or is it acquired through upbringing and environment? 

How is belief in a Creator different from belief in myths? 

These questions and more will be answered throughout this episode.