Practical Ills of Original Sin

 The notion of original sin implies that all individuals are inherently sinners, yet upon deeper analysis, it becomes apparent that this concept asserts our innate innocence as the sin we bear is not of our own making. It is crucial to note, however, that this concept finds no mention within the pages of the Bible. Instances where this notion is alluded to solely refer to earthly repercussions and do not delve into its essence further. Besides its absence from biblical teachings and its status as an innovation, there exist pragmatic grounds for advocating its prohibition.

---

It blames God which is blasphemy


As per the concept, the main one responsible for the whole of original sin is God. This is a blasphemy towards God. It attempts to degrade God by attributing Him a status of being cruel or being helpless, as He has no power to remove it. Christians believe that sacrifice and blood is required to remove this curse. This belief states that God cannot take away what He had done wrong. No wonder Christians are leaving their religion. This belief also explains the growth of Satanism as they consider Satan to be a competitor to God both having limited powers.


It degrades Prophet Adam


Prophet Adam (peace be upon him) is a man loved and respected by Muslims. He is the first man on earth and the father of all human beings. Attributing to him our sins is disrespect for our father. This concept makes him the worst man on earth and Jesus to be his complete opposite. This is also blasphemy as it insults the father of mankind and indirectly is disrespect of God.



It degrades women


Original sin gives all the blame of the incident of the apple to the mother of mankind. It degrades not only her but also all women as it blames womankind for such desires.
Original sin also degrades women in other ways such as calling motherhood a curse. In Islam, motherhood is a blessing from Allah but as per the original sin, it is a curse upon women.



It takes away the blame from the culprit and makes him a victim


Christians have a saying that is to hate the sin, love the sinner. This is against humanity. A rapist, killer, holocaust believer and performer etc are all taken as innocent people who have inherited the tendency to sin. Instead of hating them, they are loved. Another blasphemy towards God and the laws of God. The law of God says that such people should be killed. In the USA, the punishment for rape is 7 years in prison which is gross injustice to the rape victim. When Islam declares death to the rapist, the anti-God ones find it very cruel and barbaric.



It encourages other man-made concepts – One lie leads to the other


Since this concept is not to be found in the Bible, it’s followers make up lies to keep it alive and to stay away from exposing themselves. The concept is an innovation of Paul spread around by Churches. This false concept has led to other false concepts such as describing the mission of Jesus. Jesus himself says that he has come for Israel only but Paul says that his mission is to take away the sins of mankind caused by Adam. No such thing has been described in the Old Testament but one lie leads to another. This makes the Bible to be a book full of lies.




It encourages immorality


When a Christian reads that Prophets have raped, performed incest and what not, they feel that such a thing is morally not too bad. Further, these self-made acts of Prophets are defended by Christian priests and preachers who have to make up lies to defend their religion. The sin is hated and the sinner loved. Holocaust is hated but Hitler loved?


It promotes a culture of blasphemy and complacency

In the western world, we see pictures, idols, statues, movies and cartoons of religious personalities shown in a negative manner. In many pictures and movies, Adam and Eve are degraded by being shown naked, Jesus is degraded and this makes them consider their blasphemies to be freedom and art and culture. The westerners expect others to adhere to their blasphemies and when they make silly portraits of the last Prophet, they expect others to accept it as freedom.

Man-made concepts of forgiveness of sins have been invented. They make the person complacent as they can sin everyday of their life and come to Church once a week and get themselves all clean, the meter goes back to zero. Many priests have been caught taking money for such things. A totally pathetic culture is encouraged by original sin.

The devil has done careful planning!
Practical Ills of Original Sin

Original Sin and Atonement

 According to the Bible, the devil beguiled Eve who, in turn, made Adam eat the
forbidden fruit. But the real transgressor was woman as stated by St. Paul in his first epistle
to Timothy:

“And Adam was not deceived but the woman being deceived was in transgression” (2:14).

So through Eve, primarily, the Original sin was transmitted to each generation that
succeeded. Even in newly born babies the consequence of Original Sin is so severe that if
they are not baptized they are doomed to burn for ever and ever in the fire of hell (St.
Augustine). Till recently the un-baptized infants were not buried in consecrated burial
grounds because they were believed to have died in mortal sin.

Thus according to this Christian doctrine, mankind became doomed to eternal hell
because of the Original Sin, no matter how good and virtuous a man or woman may
be.

The Rev. W. Goldsek writes in this connection:
“It should be clear as daylight to anyone that God cannot break His own law: He cannot forgive a sinner without first giving him punishment. For if he did so, who would call Him just and equitable”. (Goldsek: Atonement, page 5).

So how was Divine justice satisfied? By the blood of Christ:
“Since Christ, God and man, has taken upon Himself our sins (by his death on the cross) in order to atone for them by giving satisfaction to Gods outraged justice” (Rev. J.F.DeGroot, Catholic Teaching, page 162).

• The Doctrine of Trinity defies reason and is repugnant to it. It is against the testimony of modern science, which has discovered that all of universe is one and is governed by uniform laws, so that its Creator and Ruler is One. The concept of three gods, each equal in every sense of the word and none being complete and perfect on its own casts the biggest slur on the glory, majesty and perfection of God.
  

• Similarly, the concept of Sonship and atonement of sins through vicarious sacrifice
  is defective. Is it justice that the sin, and that too a minor one committed by Adam
  and Eve, should make the whole of mankind sinners, so that even an innocent child
  who dies without baptism is condemned to eternal hell? Would even a primitive,
  backward society; accept such a view of Divine justice?
  

• Divine justice is supposed to be more just and perfect. Even if it is supposed that
  solitary and minor sin committed by Adam and Eve is transmitted throughout
  mankind till eternity, who is responsible for this transmission? Why, God of course.
  

• If so, why should mankind be doomed to eternal hell for an act of God?
  

• Is it justice again, and that too Divine, that the blood of the innocent Son (the only
  sinless person according to the Christian dogma) should absolve and redeem
  mankind?
  

• What would you think of a judge who hangs his own innocent son in place of the
  guilty criminals?
  

• And are those who believe in this doctrine redeemed of sin? In fact it encourages
  sin for a life long indulgence in sin can be washed off by confession of faith in
  atonement to a priest at the bedside of the dying person.
  

• To sum up here the story of Christianity in a few words

• Man drowned in sin, and God alienated from him and, in anger. To appease His wrath
  He sends His own son to the world through a virgin’s womb. The son is brought to the Cross and pays the penalty for human sin, thus washing away the sins of humanity with his blood. He dies for all, and then through his resurrection brings new life to mankind.
  

• This is the super- structure of Pauline schism as it was never taught by the Lord of
  Christianity. But it is not a new revelation. It has now come to light that Jesus as portrayed by Paul and others as “the new Adam” is only just the last of the virgin-born Sun-gods - Mithra, Apollo’ Bacchus, Horus, Osiris and others; all of them born at the first hour of the 25th of December. They all led a peaceful mission; the first miracle that all performed had some connection with wine; they all declared that they had come to save humanity through their blood; they all went to death at the third hour of Friday some time in March; they all remained in the tomb for two days; they all rose again on Easter Sunday; they all ascended into heaven with a promise to return.
  

• Thus centuries before the construction of the Christian church, different countries had already evolved a system of religion, which Christianity repeated word by word in the writings of the early Fathers. In the names of these virgin-born incarnates, people were initiated into their cult through baptism. Their votaries worshipped the Cross, and their great festivals were Easter and Christmas. In fact, the Roman Catholic Church, the first Church on Pauline lines after Jesus, is just a replica of the old cult of mystery; and Christian worship remains sun-worship with all its old features.
  
  

• How can we stigmatize Paganism as a false religion when all its features did but forestall the official Church in the West? If Paganism is false-hood, the formal Church must be falsehood too. Anyhow, current Christianity is not a religion if by religion is meant a code of life that may help man to live worthily in this world and in hereafter.
  

• Having briefly discussed the conceptual aspect of the Divine Being according to
  Christian dogma, one has to wonder when the upholders of the superiority of
  Christian dogma are seeking a genuine relationship with God, which one of the
  components of triune divinity do they establish such a connection with? How is
  such a relationship established and how does it benefit them spiritually? It becomes quite clear that since the concept itself is flawed, it cannot form the basis of a genuine and spiritually rewarding relationship.
  

The Bible upholds the concept of REPENTANCE

• 9:After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
  10: Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
  11: Give us this day our daily bread.
  12: And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
  13: And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and
  the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
  14: For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:
  15: But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.
  

http://www.unveilingislam.org/2Conce...OrigSin12.html

Original sin does not exist and Jesus did not die for sins

Christians say that non-Christians will go to hell for the inherited sins of Adam.
Original sin is not to be found in the Bible. It is a belief that came later into Christian books perhaps by people like Paul [1][2][3].

Ezekiel 18:4 Behold, all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die.

Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die.

“The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.” (Deuteronomy 24:16)

These verses make it clear that original sin is not a belief supported by the Bible and that we don’t need the blood of Jesus (may God bless him) to enter heaven. Good deeds with faith with the will of God will do.

Some people still disagree and present the following verses for their claim:
Gen 3:17-19
and others…
Psalms 51:5
If we look at these verses, we see that mankind is suffering due to the sin of Adam (i.e.toiling on earth). These verses do not say that mankind is bound for eternal damnation for this sin.
Psalms 52:5 actually speak of the person’s personal sins as he was an illegitimate child.

JESUS DID NOT DIE FOR SINS
Apocalypse of Peter says ‘No crucifixion’
Matthew 26:34-35, 55-57, 69-75
34 Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, That this night, before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice.
35 Peter said unto him, Though I should die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all the disciples.
…….
55 In that same hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a thief with swords and staves for to take me? I sat daily with you teaching in the temple, and ye laid no hold on me.
56 But all this was done, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. Then all the disciples forsook him, and fled.
57 And they that had laid hold on Jesus led him away to Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were assembled.
69 Now Peter sat without in the palace: and a damsel came unto him, saying, Thou also wast with Jesus of Galilee.
70 But he denied before them all, saying, I know not what thou sayest.
71 And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and said unto them that were there, This fellow was also with Jesus of Nazareth.
72 And again he denied with an oath, I do not know the man.
73 And after a while came unto him they that stood by, and said to Peter, Surely thou also art one of them; for thy speech bewrayeth thee.
74 Then began he to curse and to swear, saying, I know not the man. And immediately the cock crew.
75 And Peter remembered the word of Jesus, which said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. And he went out, and wept bitterly.

Now as we clearly see, Peter did witness the so-called crucifixion event. He was present there. The only thing that saved him from death is his denial that he knew Jesus. Otherwise, he would’ve got crucified that night.

Jesus himself says that He was not crucified and another man in place of Him got crucified who looked like Him.

This is written in the apocalypse of Peter. Below is an extract, click to see the complete book:
Extracts from the Apocalypse of Peter
“Come therefore, let us go on with the completion of the will of the incorruptible Father. For behold, those who will bring them judgment are coming, and they will be put to shame. But me they cannot touch. And you, O Peter, shall stand in their midst. Do not be afraid because of your cowardice. Their minds shall be closed, for the invisible one has opposed them.”
When he said those things, I saw him seemingly being seized by them. And I said “What do I see, O Lord, that it is you yourself whom they take, and that you are grasping me? Or who is this one, glad and laughing on the tree? And is it another one whose feet and hands they are striking?”
The Savior said to me, “He whom you saw on the tree, glad and laughing, this is the living Jesus. But this one into whose hands and feet they drive the nails is his fleshly part, which is the substitute being put to shame, the one who came into being in his likeness. But look at him and me.”
…And he said to me, “Be strong, for you are the one to whom these mysteries have been given, to know them through revelation, that he whom they crucified is the first-born, and the home of demons, and the stony vessel, in which they dwell, of Elohim, of the cross, which is under the Law.
Peter then goes on to say what Jesus further said
“These things, then, which you saw you shall present to those of another race who are not of this age (i.e., the Arabs who then became Muslims).

Original sin does not exist and Jesus did not die for sins | Invitation to Truth

The Doctrine of Original Sin

By Br. Khalid Sayfullah

"Say (O Muhammad): 'O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Exceed not the limits in your religion (by believing in something) other than the truth, and do not follow the vain desires of people who went astray in times gone by, and who misled many, and strayed (themselves) from the Right Path.'" [Qur'an 5:77]

The doctrine of original sin is one of the tenets of Christianity which was established in the 5th century A.D., under the influence of Augustine, by the Roman Catholic church. It must be understood from the beginning that this doctrine, is at best, only a theory!
Christians believe this theory to be a Bible doctrine. They reason that, since theologians and preachers teach this doctrine, then it must be true! This theory is not a Bible doctrine and nowhere in the Bible can there be found verses which give credence to it! Where, in the Bible, is it written that , "All men are guilty and condemnable for the depraved nature with which they are born"?


The fact that mankind has the boldness to propagate this (and other) theories as 'Bible truths', whilst being warned by God not to tamper with His Holy Word, by neither adding to or taking away from it, is surely one of mankind's greatest crimes!


"You must not add anything to my charge (to command, assign responsibility to), nor take anything away from it." (Deuteronomy, chapter 3, verse 4.)
"Verily, We did send down the Tauraat (to Musa), therein was guidance and light, by which the Prophets, who submitted themselves to Allah's Will, judged the Jews. And the rabbis and the priests (too judged the Jews by the Tauraat after those Prophets) for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah's Book, and they were witnesses thereto. Therefore fear not men but fear Me (O Jews) and sell not My Verses for a miserable price. And whosoever does not judge by what Allah has revealed, such are the disbelievers." [Qur'an 5:44]


Church history records that from the 2nd and 3rd century A.C. onwards, both the practices and doctrines of Christ were increasingly corrupted by heathen philosophies complete with their pagan superstitions and sense of morality. This influence was extensive. On the one hand there was unrestrained sexual lust, and on the other extremes in asceticism; the veneration and worship of saints, relics, images, and pictures; the development of a priesthood with priestly rituals and ceremonies; magical and spiritual powers ascribed to water, sacred words, and signs; water baptism for the remission of sins; and the baptism of infants. Heathen mythology was introduced and branded 'Christianity'!


Many of the early theologians were converts from heathenism, who wedded their pagan philosophical concepts to Christianity. These were educated men who gave the concepts of their heathen beliefs to Christianity, thereby corrupting the purity of the teachings of Jesus. They believed, especially Augustine, that unbaptised infants are damned because of inherited sin and guilt, and that saints and martyrs could intercede in our favour.
It was from this soil of religious ignorance and superstition that the Augustinian theory of original sin arose. The Augustinian theory declares that since all of mankind is descended from Adam, then on that basis the morality of Adam was transferred to his descendants, and therefore, all of mankind is intrinsically corrupt.


In the Bible of today we can find nothing to substantiate the doctrine of the original sin, infact we are able to find denial of such a doctrine!
"Fathers shall not be put to death for their children, nor children for their fathers; a man shall be put to death only for his own sin." (Deuteronomy, chapter 24, verse 16.)


"It is the soul that sins, and no other, that shall die; a son shall not share a father's guilt, nor a father his son's. The righteous man shall reap the fruit of his own righteousness, and the wicked man the fruit of his own wickedness." (Ezekiel, chapter 18, verse 20.)
Allah explains in Al Qur'an:
"Say: 'Shall I seek a lord other than Allah, while He is the Lord of all things? No person earns any (sin) except against himself (only), and no bearer of burdens shall bear the burden of another. Then unto your Lord is your return, so He will tell you that wherein you have been differing.'" [Qur'an 6:164]. 

 
Insha'Allah, we as Muslims are able to continue with our Da'wah towards those who are misled and misguided and Insha'Allah, those who mislead and deceive bear the burden of their own sin.

http://www.missionislam.com/comprel/origsin.htm

Did Jesus Die for Our Sins?

 Idris Tawfiq Answer

Thank you for your question and your comments, which are inspired by your desire to speak the truth about Islam.
It seems that the one you quote has a rather unusual and complicated understanding about the Christian teaching of Jesus dying on the cross for sins.
I have certainly never come across the idea before that people are actually obliged to sin in order to show their gratefulness for the forgiveness which Jesus has brought them.
This is certainly not within the scope of Roman Catholic belief, although it comes nearer to a more Evangelical belief, whereby there is nothing more that anyone can do or say because Jesus has already done it all.
Such a belief would lead some to say that even doing good deeds was not necessary, since Jesus' death on the cross had decided once and for all who had been saved in baptism. The idea of sinning on purpose, though, goes even beyond that belief and I know of no Christian Church that would subscribe to such an idea.

Understanding Christian Belief
It is a central tenet of Christian belief that Jesus died on the Cross to atone for the sins of mankind. Let us try and understand what this means.
According to such a belief, God created Adam and Eve, the first man and woman, and He placed them in the Garden of Eden, giving them everything they needed to enjoy perfect bliss. They could do anything they wanted, but were forbidden just one thing: they could not eat the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of Good and Evil.
Satan tempts Eve into eating of the fruit, and she in turn persuades Adam to do the same. As a result, the two are punished by being expelled from the Garden of Eden.
And so the Christian version of the story ends. Adam and Eve are condemned for their sin and their descendants will share forever their sin, since there is nothing they can do to make up for it.
In the Muslim account of this episode, to be found in the Qur'an, on the other hand, the couple is indeed found guilty, but they return to Allah and are forgiven. There is no inherited guilt for all eternity. Future generations come into the world sinless. In the Christian version, however, all human beings are born with Original Sin.

The Concept of Original Sin
This Original Sin is inherited because there is nothing anyone can do to make up for what Adam and Eve did. It cannot be forgiven, because this sin was committed against God, and only God Himself could forgive such a sin. Only someone equal to God could atone (or make up) for the sin.
Throughout the centuries, then, men and women tried to make up for the debt they owed to God.
At first, they offered sacrifices to their gods to please them and to stop them from harming them.
They later began to believe in only one God, but still wanted to offer sacrifice to Him to make up for the debt they owed. The problem was that they could not find anything to offer which was equal to the debt they were trying to make up for. Offering a sheep was no good, since it was God who made the sheep.
According to this doctrine of Atonement, it really needed someone superhuman, equal to God, to offer sacrifice for that first sin. Many saw in Jesus just that superhuman, equal to God Himself.
The way Saint John's Gospel describes the crucifixion of Jesus is as though Jesus mounts the cross willingly. He is not so much caught by the Jewish authorities as he is seen to be sacrificing himself. If Jesus is God's Son, then, his sacrifice is equal to the one who was offended.
Christians believe that Jesus' death on the cross meant that the Original Sin could be forgiven if people became Christian and were baptized. The act of baptism would wash away the Original Sin.

No Automatic Forgiveness
According to mainstream Christian belief, though, Jesus' death on the cross did not automatically forgive every one of the sins people would commit in the future, although it did make it possible for them to be forgiven if the sinner was truly sorry.
Your friend is mistaken, then, in thinking that mainstream Christian belief includes the idea that all of the sins he is ever going to commit will automatically be forgiven.
It is certainly outside the scope of Roman Catholic belief that he is obliged to sin in order to be grateful.

Dramatic Crucifixion
The second part of your friend's argument is flawed also. Lurid films have made the crucifixion of Jesus exceptionally cruel and brutal. Artists through the ages have shown very graphically the blood and the cruelty. Orators have appealed to the guilt of sinners by suggesting that they were responsible for Jesus' death.
For him to say that "every one of my sins represented a crack of the centurion's whip or a thorn being pressed into (Jesus') temples" is certainly very dramatic language.
Christian belief, though, teaches that Jesus died for Original Sin, which had already been committed. He was making up for something wrong that had been done, not anticipating future wrongs that might be done by individuals. These future wrongs would be forgiven in so much as the sinner was sorry.
Even though all of this doctrine is very complicated, there is still another aspect which we could mention.
There are certain Evangelical and Protestant groups which make it seem as though Jesus' death revolves around individuals: What Jesus did for me is what counts. That he is my personal savior is what is important.

Muslims Submit to Allah Alone
Islam, on the other hand, puts it the other way around. It is God (Allah) Who is important. Humans are His creatures and all they do should revolve around His will.
Muslims submit to the will of Allah, and therein find peace and fulfillment. It is not the individual who is important, but Allah alone.
On Judgment Day, each one will have to give an account for his actions, taking personal responsibility for what he has done.
Almighty Allah, who is both Merciful And Compassionate, will in sha' Allah forgive the wrong we have done.
I hope that this rather technical answer helps with your question. Please keep in touch.
Salam.

http://www.onislam.net/english/ask-about-islam/faith-and-worship/islamic-creed/167318.html

The Concept of Sin in Islam

 I do not know that much about Islam but I know that you do not believe in the original sin? How do you distinguish who is a sinner and who is not?

The Concept of Sin in Islam - Islamic Creed - counsels - OnIslam.net

The word 'Islam' in Arabic represents two basic concepts: One is 'submission' and the other is 'peace'. As the name of the religion, it stands for 'the peace we can attain in this world and the next by submitting to the One and Only God of the universe'.


Islam teaches that all the prophets of God – including Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them all) taught basically the same religion: namely 'to worship the One True God and lead a life of obedience to His commandments'.


This is what Islam stands for. And for this reason, Muslims consider all the prophets of God as prophets of Islam; and all of them preached to their people the same message.


The story of our first parents Adam and Eve narrated in the Bible is also recounted in the Quran, which was the noble Book revealed as the Last Testament of God; that is, as the perfected form of the Guidance of God, which had been progressively revealed through the earlier scriptures such as the Torah and the Gospel.


Both Christians and Muslims are united in the belief that Adam – the father of mankind – was misled by Satan to disobey God and to eat the forbidden fruit, and consequently God expelled him and his progeny from Paradise.


Muslims believe that Adam soon after the act of disobedience became aware of the seriousness of his sin and repented. He sought the forgiveness of God, and God forgave him. In the Quran we read what means:


*{We said: "O Adam! dwell you and your wife in the Garden; and eat of the bountiful things therein as (where and when) you will; but approach not this tree, or you run into harm and transgression.


Then did Satan make them slip from the (garden), and get them out of the state (of felicity) in which they had been. We said: "Get you down, all (you people), with enmity between yourselves. On earth will be your dwelling-place and your means of livelihood - for a time.


Then learnt Adam from his Lord words of inspiration, and his Lord turned towards him; for He is Oft-Returning, Most Merciful.}* (Al-Baqarah 2:35-37)


As distinct from the above narration, the Christians hold the belief that God did not forgive Adam's sin and for that reason all the children of Adam till the End of Times would bear the blemish of that sin on them.


This is what they call 'Original Sin', and this sin will not be forgiven according to them, except for those children of Adam who believe that God sent His only-begotten son to vicariously suffer and die on the cross as expiation for that sin.


Muslims do not accept that there is anything called 'original sin'. They strongly reject the idea of God begetting a son for this purpose: To them God is one and one only; He does not beget, nor is He begotten; and there is no one like God.
Sin, from the point of view of Islam, is a conscious and willful act that violates a commandment of God or the right of a fellow being. We cannot consider a person to be a sinner if he or she acts under duress or out of ignorance, because human accountability is an important aspect of justice as envisaged in Islam. And no one can be truly held accountable for an action he has no power to avoid. Because, God does not lay more burden on a human than he can bear.
Islam teaches that sin is an avoidable act that harms the perpetrator's own soul. This means that there is no innate or inherited nature that prompts a person to disobey God. That is to say, it is a person's free choice whether to sin or not; and one's disposition to sin is only as much as, if not less than, their inclination to do good.


One important teaching of Islam as taught by the Prophet is this hadith:


"Deeds are but by intentions and every person shall have what he intended." (Al-Bukhari and Muslim)


This means that a person's motive should be taken into consideration when we judge his or her actions. And we know that motive is something that is in the mind of the people and even if they speak out why they have acted in a particular way, we have no means of verifying their claim.


For instance, consider the case of a nurse who gave a patient a dose of the wrong medicine which proved fatal. The nurse may maintain that she did not know it was the wrong medicine; rather she was acting in good faith; but by mistake it happened to be the wrong medicine. If her claim is accepted, she cannot be held guilty of poisoning the patient to death. But suppose her claim is untrue. How can we know whether she is telling the truth or lying?


We may be able to see people who openly commit easily recognizable offences; but we should be on our guard before we judge a person on the basis of external evidence alone. That is to say, in a good number of cases we are likely to go wrong in our judgment. Only God can judge us and our actions correctly, without favor or prejudice.


Among the obvious sins we can count the following as examples: Associating God's creatures with God in worship, murder, adultery, robbery, bearing false witness, committing oppression, cheating, arrogant showing off, consuming usury, appropriating undeserving property especially that of orphans, plotting evil and harming people, etc.


Any person who indulges in one or more of such actions is obviously a sinner. But we should bear in mind that it is difficult for us humans to correctly evaluate a person's actions and arrive at a proper judgment. Because, we as humans, have our own limitations in properly assessing the actions of an outsider before arriving at a judgment; as we are unable to weigh the circumstances of a person's deed or his mental condition.


Therefore, only God Almighty can be the Judge of our beliefs and actions; and hence He is described in the Quran as "the Owner of the Day of Judgment."


In Islam, all sins can be forgiven except associating others with God. Whatever sins a Muslim commits, will be pardoned if he offers sincere repentance and does a lot of good deeds. The good deeds wipe out the bad ones. The door of repentance is always open and Allah will accept the repentance until the Muslim dies.

Is Man Born Sinful?

---

Is Man Born Sinful? - Muslim Belief - counsels - OnIslam.net

In the Name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful.

All praise and thanks are due to Allah, and peace and blessings be upon His Messenger.

Dear questioner, we would like to thank you for the great confidence you place in us, and we implore Allah Almighty to help us serve His cause and render our work for His Sake.

First of all, it is to be stated that the Original Sin doctrine is in utter contradiction to the Islamic belief. In this regard, we’d like to cite the following:

“Islam rejects the premises of the concept of Original Sin which is alien to Islam and inconceivable to the Muslim mind. Islam has a different version of the Fall. Adam acknowledged that he had gone astray and sincerely sought Allah’s forgiveness which was granted to him unconditionally. Adam and his progeny descended from bliss to the earth because of his error, and yet, none of his children inherited the blame for his error. The volitional implication of Fitrah is that man is responsible for his own wrong actions. It is inconceivable to Muslim thinking that mankind should be punished for wrong actions that others did. The concept of Divine forgiveness features strongly in the Qur’an, for Allah accepts the sincere repentance of His slaves.

Almighty Allah says: “But Satan caused them to deflect therefrom and expelled them from the (happy) state in which they were; and We said: Fall down, one of you a foe unto the other! There shall be for you on earth a habitation and provision for a time. Then Adam received from his Lord words (of revelation), and He relented toward him. Lo! He is the Relenting the Merciful.” (Al-Baqarah: 36-37)

Tawbah (literally, turning, i.e. away from wrong action, and to Allah) or repentance plays a very significant and decisive role in a Muslim’s life. Although man is born in a state of original goodness or Fitrah, he is also subject to temptation and folly. Allah has granted him the ability and opportunity to repent which means that he should admit his errors and turn remorsefully away from them to Allah.

Knowledge of Divine mercy as well as knowledge of the innate goodness of the human Fitrah, serves three very important functions: firstly it gives the believer hope of salvation and success; secondly, it gives him confidence in his own potential to do right and resist wrong; thirdly, it exhorts and admonishes him to actively pursue all that is right and resist all that is wrong. These are the merits of sincere repentance. Just as the Prophet Adam, peace be upon him, repented and was pardoned for his wrong action, so may his descendents repent and be pardoned for their wrong actions.”

Source: Welcome thetruereligion.org

Shedding more light on the question in point, Sheikh Ahmad Kutty, a senior lecturer and an Islamic scholar at the Islamic Institute of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, states:

“According to the Qur’anic perspective, man has been created with the equal inclination for good or bad. Allah says in the Qur’an: “And a soul and Him Who perfected it. And inspired it (with conscience of) what is wrong for it and (what is) right for it. He is indeed successful who causeth it to grow, And he is indeed a failure who stunteth it.” (Ash-Shams: 7-10)

Based on this and other Qur’anic verses, all of us has the propensity to do good or bad. So, in Islam we can choose either of the two ways: right or wrong and we are rewarded accordingly.

Human beings themselves recognize when they do sin that they have the choice to avoid it. When they do something good they have the choice to do it and they feel good about it.

If human beings had been on sins and they had no choice but to do sins, then there is no wisdom behind punishment. Allah Almighty is All-Wise and All-Just. He has assured us in the Qur’an: “No soul will be questioned about what another soul has don.” (Al-Israa’: 15)

This means that the sin of Adam did not pass on to his offspring; he paid for his own sin and we must pay for our sins unless Allah forgives us.

The Islamic concept in this matter is fully consistent with reason and revelation. It is also consistent with the teachings of the Gospel and the Old Testament before the Christians invented the doctrine of the Original Sin. As historians have pointed out, the concept of Original Sin and the Jesus being crucified or the sins of humankind had been imported to Christianity from Pagan sources.”