Friday, 6 January 2017

Is Shia Muslim?

Decide yourself !

001. Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na'uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 - Published Iran]
002. None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 - Published Iran]
003. Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 - Published Iran]
004. The fourteen innocents (Ma'sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na'uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 - Published Lahore]
005. There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na'uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A'yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
006. To call ALLAH Omnipresent and Omniscient is against faith (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
007. Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his descendants are omnipresent and omniscient, and it is only theirs quality, not of ALLAH’s (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
008. ALLAH when talks about blessings, does so in Persian and when talks about persecution does so in Arabic (Na’uzubillah). [Tareekh-e-Islam, Pg#163 – Published Lahore]
009. Shiite confession of faith “LA ILAHA IL-ALLAH-U MUHAMMAD-UR RASOOL-ULLAH ALI-UN WALI-ULLAH WASI-U RASOOL-ULLAH WA KHALIFA-TU BILA FASL” (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#10 – Published Lahore]
010. Wherever Quran referred the word “RABB”, it meant as Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#66 – Published Lahore]
011. Original Quran will not come into view till the manifestation of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#360 - Published Iran]
012. Collectors of Quran eliminated virtues of Prophet’s progeny from Surah Al-Ahzab which was about to the length of Surah Al-Bakrah (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#66 - Published Iran]
013. Usman (r.a) made alteration in Surah Al-Rehman by eliminating words “MINKUM” (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#525 - Published Iran]
014. Quran has been purposely altered by the drunkard Caliphs {Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a)}; The present Quran is false; It’s the duty of Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) to bring it in its original form; When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come, then the Quran will be recited in its original form (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#12, Pg#384 – Published India]
015. “ILAA AJALIN-MUSAMMA” has been removed from the Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#60 – Published Karachi]
016. Quranic verses were not arranged by Abu-Bakr (r.a) in the same order as that in which it was revealed {hence Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran and present day Quran is incorrect} (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#134 – Published Karachi]
017. After the death of Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) original Quran was in the possession of Ali (r.a) which he brought before Abu-Bakr (r.a) but He refused to prevail such version that is why Muslim Ummah was deprived of original Quran (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#138 – Published Karachi]
018. To provide reasoning to “WATI-FIL-DUBR” changes were made in the Quranic comprehension (Na’uzubillah). [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#415 – Published Iran]
019. The present (false) Quran doesn’t mentions the name of “Pakistan” however  ours (SHIAs) true Quran even have the name of “Pakistan” (Na’uzubillah). [Hazar Tumhari Das Hamari, Pg#554 – Published Karachi]
020. Shiites scholars believe that Ali (r.a) and all his innocent patriarchs are superior to all Prophets (a.s) except Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#70 - Published Iran]
021. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will come out of his cave he will be naked like a newborn and the first person who shall take the oath of allegiance on his hands will be the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 - Published Iran]
022. The greatest slander upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) of sexual intercourse… (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#119 – Published Iran]
023. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) used to perform Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#118 – Published Iran]
024. On the night of consummation of marriage of Ali (r.a) and Fatima (r.a), Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) instructed them not to start their work (sexual intercourse) until He arrives their (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#251 – Published Multan]
025. Ali (r.a) and other Ahlul Bayt (r.a) are equal in the rank with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and are superior to all other Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]
026. After ALLAH and Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) only Holy Descendants (r.a) reached the height of saintliness, rest all other Prophets (a.s) and Angels (a.s) lie below their ranks (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#29 – Published Lahore]
027. Jibrael (Gabriel) used to talk with Fatima (r.a) {after the death of Muhammad (s.a.w.w)} (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#1, Pg#198 – Published Multan]
028. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and his Holy Descendants (r.a) are not the offspring of Adam (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
029. Adam (a.s)’s prayers were accepted on the mediation of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ali (r.a), Fatima (r.a), Hasan (r.a) and Hussain (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]
030. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) had some purpose to acquiesce Usman (r.a) with Himself otherwise that man was of no use to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#129 – Published Karachi]
031. Adam (a.s) became Infidel due to His jealousy (Na'uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#428 - Published Iran]
032. Ali (r.a) possesses same rights as were kept by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#380 - Published Iran]
033. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) taught Taqiyyah (conceal the facts) to Abu-Zar Ghaffari (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#92 – Published Karachi]
034. The rank of Imams (12 Imams) is higher than every Prophet (a.s) and every Angel (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Hakumat-e-Islamiah, Pg#52 – Published Iran]
035. Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s house was like that of dirge player’s house (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]
036. What was the compulsion on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) that He used to do intercourse with Ayesha (r.a) during her menses? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#63 – Published Lahore]
037. What the lady “Zulekhah”, Ayesha (r.a) had got that Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) despite having coeval wives or other young ladies, married with a nine years old little mother at His age of fifty (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]
038. Slander to Ali (r.a) to declare rape as a dogmatic matrimonial (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#467 – Published Iran]
039. One who does not consider Ali (r.a) as the first Caliph (successor) is an apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#3, Pg#264 - Published Iran]
040. To marry Umm-e-Kulsoom (r.a) with Umar (r.a) was a subterfuge on the part of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#81-82 - Published Iran]
041. Penis proclaimed the Imamate (patriarchate) of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Aasar-e-Haidery, Pg#557 – Published Lahore]
042. When the last era will come, Ali (r.a) will appear (Na'uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#603 - Published Lahore]
043. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a cattle who will arise from earth before the Doomsday) (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#602 - Published Lahore]
044. Ayesha (r.a) was an American Lady or any European Madam? (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#64 – Published Lahore]
045. Hafsa (r.a), a bad natured woman, was accepted by Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)… She was a pig-faced woman (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#124 – Published Lahore]
046. Ali (r.a) is Dabat-ul-Arz (a four-legged animal) (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#336 - Published Iran]
047. When Imam Mehdi will appear, he will first dig out Ayesha (r.a) from Her grave and will reprehend her (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#347 - Published Iran]
048. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) who gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#700 – Published Iran]
049. Ayesha (r.a) and Shiites Imam performed Muta’h (a form of temporary marriage regarded as illegitimate in Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Jawaz-e-Muta’h, Pg#78 – Published Bhakkar]
050. Jealousy, hatred and resentment were the attributes of Ayesha (r.a)’s nature (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#40]
051. Ayesha (r.a) use to misbehave, oppose, talk louder, babble and slander on Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#70]
052. The youth of this misfortune {Ayesha (r.a)} would have spoil the old age of Mua’zzamah (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#88]
053. Ayesha (r.a) used to babble and fight with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#53]
054. On not arriving of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), Ayesha (r.a) suffered with the fits of madness and passion (Na’uzubillah). [Hazrat Ayesha Ki Tareekhi Haisiyat, Pg#54]
055. After the death when Angels of grave start questioning then Maula’s {Ali (r.a)} chair is being brought and sins are pardoned only after recognizing him (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
056. Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) & Umar (r.a)}, Hafsa (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) gave poison to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#28, Pg#894 – Published India]
057. Ayesha (r.a) for the first time initiated the war customs (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#275 – Published Karachi]
058. Ayesha (r.a) was a malicious and short-tempered woman (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#289 – Published Karachi]
059. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a) had become apostate by narrating forged Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#475 – Published Karachi]
060. Ayesha (r.a) used to say that kill the Na’sal {Usman (r.a)} because he has become a Infidel (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#Preface – Published Karachi]
061. Ayesha (r.a)’s heart was blacked-out (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#30 – Published Karachi]
062. Ayesha (r.a) had such an opposition with Usman (r.a) that she ordered for his murder (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#31 – Published Karachi]
063. Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) played a cunning game like fox upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#69 – Published Lahore]
064. O Sunnis! Is Ayesha (r.a) a woman or a female monkey? (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#67 – Published Lahore]
065. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will resurrect Sheikheen (r.a) {Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a)} and punish them by hanging on the tree (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#361 - Published Iran]
066. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear, before other nonbelievers, he will kill Ahl-e-Sunnah and Ahl-e-Sunnah scholars (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#527 - Published Iran]
067. Imams used to say Salam to each other while taking bath (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#118 - Published Iran]
068. Imams are not born through the womb of their mothers but they are born from the sides of their mothers (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#474 – Published Lahore]
069. Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) recited Holy Quran and called Salam in the womb of his mother (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#475 – Published Lahore]
070. Imams are also innocent like the Prophets (a.s) (Na’uzubillah). [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#28 – Published Lahore]
071. Abdullah Ibn-e-Saba was the first who declared the faith in Imamat and that Ali (r.a) is the true God (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#234 - Published Iran]
072. We (Imams) among ALLAH’s creatures are His eyes and among His servants (human being) the people of command (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#260 - Published Iran]
073. In the early Islamic period due to Taqiyyah (subterfuge), Shiites scholars used to hide the Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#92 - Published Iran]
074. To weep on the vulnerability of Imams and to hide the secrets is like Holy crusade (Jihad) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#283 - Published Iran]
075. World cannot exist without Imam (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#233 - Published Iran]
076. Imams know all what happened earlier and what is about to happen and nothing remains hidden to them (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#10 - Published Iran]
077. Without knowing the Imam, God cannot be proved (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#331 - Published Iran]
078. Imam knows the time of his death and dies by his own will (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#23 - Published Iran]
079. Imam has greater qualities than the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#299-300 - Published Iran]
080. Imams are equal in the status with Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#287 - Published Iran]
081. Imam get revelations (WAHI by ALLAH) (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#329-330 - Published Iran]
082. In the state of Taqiyyah (subterfuge) whatever Imam says just obey him and act accordingly (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#72 - Published Iran]
083. The Angels reveal upon Imams in the Shab-e-Qadr (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#569 - Published Lahore]
084. When Imam Mehdi (SHIAs 12th Imam) will appear there will be only forty perfect believers (Mo’min) in the world (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#571 - Published Lahore]
085. All Angels, Jibrail (a.s) {Gabriel (a.s)} and Mikail (a.s) will take the oath of allegiance upon Imam Mehdi’s (SHIAs 12th Imam) hand (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#594 - Published Lahore]
086. After Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s death all his disciples except four became apostate (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#81 - Published Iran]
087. Umar (r.a) told to Satan that he had invaded the Caliphate of Ali (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#1, Pg#82 - Published Iran]
088. Ali (r.a) imprecated Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) to ruin in life and thereafter (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#189 - Published Iran]
089. The first three Caliphs (r.a) and other Sahabah (r.a) became apostate due to the denial of Ali (r.a)’s prophecy (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#2, Pg#184 - Published Iran]
090. Mua’wiyah (r.a) can be associated with whole vice (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#35 – Published Karachi]
091. Sahabah (r.a) brought disgrace upon Islam in Uhad War (Na’uzubillah). [Ay As As, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]
092. Ja’far Sadiq (r.t.a) never stood up from the prayer mat unless he had not sent curse upon Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a), Hafsa (r.a), Hind (r.a) and Umm-ul-Hakm (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#599 – Published Iran]
093. After the death of Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), except three all the Sahabah (r.a) have become apostate (Na’uzubillah). [A’yn-ul-Hayat, Pg#3 – Published Iran]
094. The first after Satan who had accepted his religion is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#18 – Published Lahore]
095. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was of the same belief which was founded by Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#22 – Published Lahore]
096. We have only La’nat (curse) and Tabbarah (imprecation) for Abu-Hurairah (r.a) like narrators (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#20 – Published Lahore]
097. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was a disgraced character (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#65 – Published Lahore]
098. Mua’wiyah (r.a) and Abu-Hurairah (r.a) were infidels and apostates (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#79 – Published Lahore]
099. Sahabah (r.a)’s testimonial cannot save them from imprecation (Na’uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#32 – Published Lahore]
100. Sahabah (r.a) were not blessed according to the Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s Hadiths (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#68 – Published Karachi]
101. Some Sahabah (r.a) performed evil deeds; they did the acts of stealing, rape and telling a lie (Na’uzubillah). [Char Yaar, Pg#64 – Published Karachi]
102. Ayesha (r.a) use to compare Usman (r.a) with a Jew named Na’sal and say that he should be killed (Na’uzubillah). [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#584 - Published Lahore]
103. The caliphate of first three caliphs is like the penis of donkey (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#72 – Published Lahore]
104. Sahabah (r.a) made innovations in the religion after Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w), cut Islam into pieces and minced the Shari’ah (Islamic Jurisprudence) (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
105. Sodomy was very common among various Sahabah (r.a); for e.g. Waleed bin Mugha’irah, Umar (r.a)… (Na’uzubillah). [Haqiqat Fiqah-e-Hanafiah Dar Jawab Fiqah-e-Jafariyah, Pg#59 – Published Lahore]
106. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a) and Usman (r.a) will enter into hell through a special door (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#500 - Published Iran]
107. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a) and Mua’wiyah will be persecuted severely than other hellish people (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#503 - Published Iran]
108. Abu-Bakr (r.a), Umar (r.a), Usman (r.a), Mua’wiyah (r.a), Ayesha (r.a) and Hafsa (r.a) are the worst creatures (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#519 - Published Iran]
109. Abbas (r.a) and Aqeel (r.a) were weak believers and men of mean spirit (Na’uzubillah). [Hayat-ul-Quloob, Vol#2, Pg#618 – Published Iran]
110. There is no difference in the faith of Abu-Bakar and in the faith of Satan (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#93 – Published Lahore]
111. Abu-Hurairah (r.a) was the greatest liar who associated false Hadiths to Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#442 – Published Lahore]
112. Mua’wiyah (r.a) was apostate, the greatest non believer and a corrupt man (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]
113. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was a puppet in the hands of Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#92 – Published Lahore]
114. Mua’wiyah (r.a) is being burnt inside a coffin beneath the interior most part of the hell and if Pharaoh (Firo’un) would have not said “INNA RABBI-KUM-UL-A’LA” there would be no one below Mua’wiyah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#316 – Published Lahore]
115. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s mother and granny were prostitutes (Na’uzubillah). [Kaleed-e-Manazrah, Pg#301 – Published Lahore]
116. Usman (r.a) protested against Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and disobeyed him (Na’uzubillah). [Quran Translation by Maqbool Hussain Delhvi, Chap#30, Pg#934 – Published India]
117. Quran does not show the superiority of Abu-Bakr (r.a) but the infidelity of Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Manazarah Hussainiyah, Pg#47 – Published Lahore]
118. Zubair bin Al-Awam (r.a) is the breed of Muta’h (temporary marriage illegitimate according to Islam) (Na’uzubillah). [Muta’h Aur Salahuddin A’ybi, Pg#24 – Published Karachi]
119. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cunning person (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#339 – Published Karachi]
120. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) made naked himself… (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]
121. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a liar and a miser (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#147 – Published Karachi]
122. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a)’s mother was a big liar. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#146 – Published Karachi]
123. Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) was a cheater. [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#245 – Published Karachi]
124. Abu-Moosa Asha’ri and Umr’o bin Al-Aas (r.a) were hypocrites and traitors (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#474 – Published Karachi]
125. The history of the first three Caliphs was full of ignorance, stupidity, brutality, bribery and sinfulness (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#252 – Published Karachi]
126. How unfortunate are these Talha (r.a), Zubair (r.a) and Ayesha (r.a)! (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]
127. Mua’wiyah used to feign and wile (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#421 – Published Karachi]
128. The Holy Prophet (s.a.w.w) himself passed the orders of Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s murder (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]
129. Mua’wiyah (r.a)’s all army men were foul-natured, bastards, wile and non-believers (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#473 – Published Karachi]
130. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) himself and his father were hypocrites and imps (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#775 – Published Karachi]
131. Mugha’irah bin Shaiba (r.a) was very unfortunate in faith and Islam and he left this world in the same state (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#258 – Published Karachi]
132. Rural-ship of a villager is better than the piety of Sahabah (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#432 – Published Karachi]
133. Talha (r.a) and Zubair (r.a) were seditious, vicious and dissentious persons who could commit any crime for wealth and power (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#443 – Published Karachi]
134. Among a few extremely remorseful and shameful characters of the world, one is of Zubair (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Nehj-ul-Bala’gah, Pg#48 – Published Karachi]
135. Usman (r.a) reaped whatever he sew (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#108 – Published Karachi]
136. Usman (r.a)’s mother was a prostitute (Na’uzubillah). [Na’sal Ko Qatal Kar Do, Pg#18 – Published Karachi]
137. I dare say that today’s Iranic Nation is far better than the people of Hijaz (Sahabah) in Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s era (Na’uzubillah). [Sahifah-e-Inqalab {Khomeini’s last will and testament}, Pg#46]
138. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was habitual of using foul-mouth and giving abuses (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#148 – Published Karachi]
139. Abu-Bakr (r.a) used to abuse very often (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#21 – Published Karachi]
140. Abu-Bakr (r.a) had no religious status (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#8 – Published Karachi]
141. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was like Halaku and Changez (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#10 – Published Karachi]
142. Abu-Bakr (r.a) was only curious about the money in his Caliphate (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#142 – Published Karachi]
143. Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) were culpable and unforgiving (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#159 – Published Karachi]
144. Mua’wiyah (r.a) killed Ayesha (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#32 – Published Karachi]
145. Umar (r.a) not even liked Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w) and His daughter (Na’uzubillah). [Sheikh-e-Saqifah, Pg#94 – Published Karachi]
146. Starting from the day first, Umar (r.a) is responsible for the hostilities and blood-shedding among the Muslims (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#63 – Published Karachi]
147. Umar (r.a) passed humiliating sentences upon Prophet Muhammad (s.a.w.w)’s sayings (Na’uzubillah). [Waqi’a Qirtas Aur Kirdar-e-Umar, Pg#67 – Published Karachi]
148. Abbas (r.a)’s false allegations upon Abu-Bakr (r.a) and Umar (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Wohi Mujrim Wohi Munsif, Pg#75]
149. Umar (r.a) was sent to Hell on 9th Rab’i-ul-Awwal (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#404 – Published Iran]
150. Curse upon Ayesha (r.a) and Umar (r.a); Mua’wiyah (r.a) was sent to Hell on 22nd Rajab so this day must be celebrated (with Koondas) (Na’uzubillah). [Zaad-ul-Mua’d, Pg#34 – Published Iran]
151. Last diet of Umar (r.a)’s was Vine (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#241 – Published Lahore]
152. Umar (r.a) belonged to such family in which mothers and sisters are made as wives (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#306 – Published Lahore]
153. Umar (r.a) is the lock of Hell, it was better if he would be the gate (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#430 – Published Lahore]
154. Umar (r.a) and Waleed Bin Mugha’irah (r.a) were she-gay (Na’uzubillah). [Sehm Masmoom, Pg#246 – Published Lahore]
155. Nikkah is valid without the witnesses. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#5, Pg#387 – Published Iran]
156. Quran can be recited in toilet (Na’uzubillah). [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#502 – Published Iran]
157. By hiding the private parts with only hand, Sattr can be achieved. [Fir’o-ul-Kaafi, Vol#6, Pg#501 – Published Iran]
158. What so ever the Ahl-e-Sunnah scholar tells about some query, to do its opposite is SHIA religion. [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#3, Pg#55 - Published Iran]
159. According to SHIA scholars, Ahl-e-Sunnah are worse and dirtiest infidels than the Jews or Christians or Majoos (Na'uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na'umania, Vol#2, Pg#306 - Published Iran]
160. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the true religion. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#332 - Published Iran]
161. Taqiyyah (concealing the facts) is the part of belief. [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#3, Pg#328 - Published Iran]
162. By not reciting “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH”, Ahl-e-Sunnah are not Mo’min (Na'uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#13 – Published Lahore]
163. ALLAH produces 70 Angels from the couple who perform Muta’h which keep on praying for them (Na'uzubillah). [Chara’gh-e-Mustafvi Aur Sharar Bu-Lehbi, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]
164. Ahl-e-Sunnah (Nasibi) are worse than dog in front of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Haq-ul-Yaqeen, Pg#516 - Published Iran]
165. Black dress is the dress of people of Hell (Na’uzubillah). [Hulya-tul-Muttaqeen, Pg#8 - Published Iran]
166. Leavings of Ahl-e-Sunnah’s are as Haram then any other Non-Muslim. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#8  - Published Iran]
167. Niece and Aunts can remain in Nikkah at a time. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#260  - Published Iran]
168. Donkey’s flesh is Halal. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#213  - Published Iran]
169. Black dress is the dress of Firo’un. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#163  - Published Iran]
170. No witness is required in the Nikkah as GOD Himself is. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#4 ,Pg#251  - Published Iran]
171. Present Azaan is correct, curse be upon Mafoodha who innovated “ALI-UN-WALI-ULLAH” in Azaan. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#188  - Published Iran]
172. There is no right for Ahl-e-Sunnah in Islam so Nikkah with them is also Haram. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#3 ,Pg#258  - Published Iran]
173. Istinja (washing of private parts) with Saliva is legitimate. [Malla Yahzur-ul-Faqeeh (Fiqah-e-Jafariyah), Vol#1 ,Pg#41  - Published Iran]
174. Announcement of SHIA Kalimah; reciting “LA-ILAHA-ILL-ALLAHU-MUHAMMAD-UR-RASOOL-ULLAH” is not the sign of Iman. [Shia Mazhab Haq Hai, Pg#3 – Published Lahore]
175. Neither Fasting is spoiled nor Bath (Ghusl) is subjected by doing un-natural things with a women. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#460 – Published Iran]
176. Own female servant can be given to someone temporarily for Muta’h practices. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#244 – Published Iran]
177. Muta’h can also be done with Non-Muslims. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#256 – Published Iran]
178. A man can even take benefit (by doing Muta’h) from a woman for about an hour or so. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#266 – Published Iran]
179. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) has no accountability; it can be done with 1000 even. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#258-259 – Published Iran]
180. Imams use to order openly for Muta’h. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#253 – Published Iran]
181. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#302 – Published Iran]
182. Ahl-e-Sunnah are infidels (Kafir) so Nikkah with them is illegitimate and their slaughtered animals are also Haram. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#303 – Published Iran]
183. Muta’h (illegitimate temporary marriage) is legitimate even for the sake of a piece of wood. [Tehzeeb-ul-Ahkaam, Vol#7, Pg#267 – Published Iran]
184. MEHRAM male and female can see each other’s body. [Tohfa Namaz Ja’fariyah, Pg#292 – Published Lahore]
References: http://kr-hcy.com/references/shia/index.shtml

Thursday, 5 January 2017

Muslim Destroys Atheism in few seconds


Dr. Laurence Brown
A graduate from two Ivy League universities with sub-specialty training in ophthalmology, Dr. Brown served as a respected ophthalmologist in the U.S. Air Force for a period of eight years. His term of service was distinguished by earning the position of Chief of Ophthalmology, both at Lakenheath Air Force Base in England and at Eglin Air Force Base in Florida (the largest military base in the free world). Dr. Laurence Brown received his BA from Cornell University, his MD from Brown University Medical School, and his ophthalmology residency training at George Washington University Hospital in Washington, DC.

-----
O''Reilly said (about the atheist Steven Hawkings):

If he [Steven hawkings] wants to explain how (the earth got here, why the sun comes up and goes down without interruption, why the tide goes in out and out, no miscommunications whatsoever) if he is willing to explain how all that happens, we're ready to recieve him.

Its just as much of a stretch to be an atheist as it is to believe in God, because there is no explanation as to how the planet got here. And Steven Hawkings doesn't have it.

Why muslims are circumcised ?

Quote:
An unforunately recently-turned atheist (from muslim) friend of mine was talking to me about circumcision and how it's against human rights and causes unnecessary deaths etc.
"Circumcision of newborn boys (I.e., within the first month of life) brings numerous health benefits, including:
1 – Protection against local infection in the penis, which may result from the presence of the foreskin, causing tightening of the foreskin, which may lead to retention of urine or infections of the glans (tip) of the penis – which require circumcision in order to treat these problems. In chronic cases, the child may be exposed to numerous diseases in the future, the most serious of which is cancer of the penis.
2 – Infections of the urethra. Many studies have proven that uncircumcised boys are more exposed to infection of the urethra. In some studies the rate was 39 times more among uncircumcised boys. In other studies the rate was ten times more. Other studies showed that 95% of children who suffered from infections of the urethra were uncircumcised, whereas the rate among circumcised children did not exceed 5%.
In children, infection of the urethra is serious in some cases. In the study by Wisewell on 88 children who suffered infections of the urethra, in 36 % of them, the same bacteria was found in the blood also. Three of them contracted meningitis, and two suffered renal failure. Two others died as a result of the spread of the micro-organisms throughout the body.
3 – Protection against cancer of the penis: the studies agree that cancer of the penis is almost non-existent among circumcised men, whereas the rate among uncircumcised men is not insignificant. In the US the rate of penile cancer among circumcised men is zero, whilst among uncircumcised men it is 2.2 in every 100,000 of the uncircumcised population. As most of the inhabitants of the US are circumcised, the cases of this cancer there are between 750 and 1000 per year. If the population were not circumcised, the number of cases would reach 3000. In countries where boys are not circumcised, such as China, Uganda and Puerto Rico, penile cancer represents between 12-22 % of all cancers found in men; this is a very high percentage.
4 – Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Researchers found that the STDs which are transmitted via sexual contact (usually because of fornication/adultery and homosexuality) spread more among those who are not circumcised, especially herpes, soft chancres, syphilis, candida, gonorrhea and genital warts.
There are numerous modern studies which confirm that circumcision reduces the possibility of contracting AIDS when compared to their uncircumcised counterparts. But that does not rule out the possibility of a circumcised man contracting AIDS as the result of sexual contact with a person who has AIDS. Circumcision is not a protection against it, and there is no real way of protecting oneself against the many sexually transmitted diseases apart from avoiding fornication/adultery, promiscuity, homosexuality and other repugnant practices. (From this we can see the wisdom of Islamic sharee'ah in forbidding fornication/adultery and homosexuality).
5 – Protection of wives against cervical cancer. Researchers have noted that the wives of circumcised men have less risk of getting cervical cancer than the wives of uncircumcised men.
Health Benefits taken from: al-Khitaan, p. 76, by Dr. Muhammad al-Baar. 


why created circumcised?

Quote:
ولذلك :
ولما كان
شرع الله وفطرته للناس لا يأتيان إلا بخير :
فقد جاءت
سنن الفطرة التي أمر بها الله أنبياءه يبلغونها للناس : كانت لا تقف على
حدود نص الآيات .. وإنما كانت موافقة لكل خير ٍ:
شرعا ًوخلقا ًوطبا ًودينا ً!!!..

Quote:
وأما قوله تعالى: لَقَدْ خَلَقْنَا الْإِنْسَانَ فِي أَحْسَنِ تَقْوِيمٍ {التين: 4} فمعناه ـ كما قال البغوي في تفسيره : أي أعدل قامة وأحسن صورة، وذلك أنه خلق كل حيوان منكبًا على وجهه إلا الإنسان خلقه مديد القامة، يتناول مأكوله بيده، مُزَينَّا بالعقل والتمييز. اهـ.
وقال السعدي: أي تام الخلق، متناسب الأعضاء، منتصب القامة، لم يفقد مما يحتاج إليه ظاهرًا أو باطنًا شيئًا اهـ.

وهناك قول آخر ذكره الطبري فقال: وقال آخرون: بل معنى ذلك: لقد خلقنا الإنسان، فبلغنا به استواء شبابه وجلده وقوّته، وهو أحسن ما يكون، وأعدل ما يكون وأقومه. اهـ.
فأي تناقض بين هذا وبين شريعة الإسلام السمحة في إزالة ما يشوه الخلقة ويضر الإنسان، وهو ما يعرف بسنن الفطرة، فقد قال النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم: الفطرة خمس: الختان والاستحداد وقص الشارب وتقليم الأظفار ونتف الآباط. متفق عليه

For sunnah rejectors, Read:

The Authority of Sunnah by Mufti Taqi Usmani (http://www.defending-islam.com/page238.html)
The Fallacies of Anti Hadith Arguments By Shah Shahidullah Faridi (http://www.defending-islam.com/page236.html)
http://www.defending-islam.com/page415.html
http://www.answering-christianity.co..._quranists.htm
http://www.scribd.com/doc/16801824/Status-of-the-Sunnah-in-Islaam-Answering-Quranists

Circumcision should be offered 'like vaccines' to the parents of baby boys, new study

  • The health benefits of male circumcision 'outweigh the risks 100 to one'
  • Half of uncircumcised men develop a health problem as a result, it is claimed
  • It would be 'unethical' not to offer it to the parents of all baby boys, the researchers state
By Daily Mail Reporter; April 2014



Circumcision should be offered to babies the same way that vaccinations are, an academic has claimed.

The health benefits of male circumcision far outweigh the risks by more than 100 to one, according to Professor Brian Morris.

His study found that over their lifetime, half of uncircumcised men will contract an adverse medical condition caused by their foreskin.
Parents of boys should be offered circumcision for their sons just as they are offered vaccines, a study has claimed


The joint Australian and American research team said their findings add considerable weight to the latest American Academy of Paediatrics policy that supports education and access for infant male circumcision.

Circumcision rates for babies in the U.S. have fallen from a high of 83 per cent in the 1960s to 77 per cent today.

Study leader Brian Morris, Professor Emeritus in the School of Medical Sciences at the University of Sydney, who worked with colleagues in Florida and Minnesota, said: ‘There seemed to be two major reasons for the fall.
‘One is a result of demographic changes, with the rise in the Hispanic population.

‘Hispanic families tend to be less familiar with the custom, making them less likely to circumcise their baby boys.

‘The other is the current absence of Medicaid coverage for the poor in 18 U.S. states. In those states, circumcision is 24 per cent lower.’

He added: ‘The new findings now show that infant circumcision should be regarded as equivalent to childhood vaccination and that as such it would be unethical not to routinely offer parents circumcision for their baby boy.

‘Delay puts the child's health at risk and will usually mean it will never happen.’

He said in infancy, the strongest immediate benefit is protection against urinary tract infections (UTIs) that can damage the kidneys.

Professor Morris and co-investigator Dr Tom Wiswell, of the Centre for Neonatal Care in Orlando, Florida, showed last year that over the lifetime, UTIs affect one in three uncircumcised males.

Professor Morris, with Dr John Krieger, of the Department of Urology at the University of Washington in Seattle, showed that there is no adverse effect of circumcision on sexual function, sensitivity, or pleasure.
This helped dispel one myth perpetuated by opponents of the procedure.

Prof Morris added: ‘Taken together, the new findings should send a strong message to medical practitioners, professional bodies, educators, policy makers, governments, and insurers to promote this safe, simple procedure, best done in infancy under local anaesthesia and to increase access and third party coverage, especially for poor families, who tend to suffer most from foreskin-related diseases.

‘Infant circumcision has, moreover, been shown to be cost saving.’

The study was published in the journal Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

Pillars of Atheism

Atheism is a negative, fairy-tale, emotional, irrational reaction to the belief in the creator, but it still has pillars like religion.


The first pillar:
An atheist disbelieves in God but testify that there is no God but matter, and matter doesn't finish or perish and it doesn't come from nothing.  The material world is the god of atheists willingly or unwillingly. Atheist believes in pantheism, the creator and creation are one thing: matter. he puts the attributes of the creator on the matter, it has no beginning no end, a wise and all-knowing matter!

The second pillar:
An atheist doesn't believe in angels but he believes in green, ugly, big bellies, big heads, very intelligent aliens. Dawkins claimed that they put DNA in his cells. Anyways, it is an atheistic belief and there is no proof for it except in anime and fiction.


Third pillar:
An atheist disbelieves in holy scriptures and claim that it is a human invention, but he still believes in books of his material religion, and the best one to his religion is "The Origin of Species" of the "prophet Darwin". Atheists believe in it so much even though science disproved it, but atheism is a blind faith.

The forth pillar:
Ann atheist disbelieves in prophets and messengers, but he believes in preachers of atheism, and ascribes to them the attributes of infallibility, dignity and magnification. No day passes without mentioning Dawkns, Hitchens and Harris.

The fifth Pillar:
An atheist disbelieves in hereafter, but he believes in other worlds which he doesn't see and have no proof, he believes in it just because the mastermind preachers of atheism supposed it when the facts of today's science forced them to a narrow corner, and they got countless proofs of intelligent design in the universe, then they escaped to the myth of "Parallel Universes" .

The sixth pillar:
An atheist disbelieve in Divine Predestination, but he believes in obeying of the power of matter upon him, he is just a programmed Darwinist machine, that's why he denies his free will, and in the best conditions he describes it as a delusion in his brain as a result of Darwinian evolution.

Do you understand now your belief, mindless atheist? Have you fulfilled your belief pillars, or you are just a half atheist? If you believe in these pillars then you are a good atheist and your heart is harder than a stone.
Thanks to Allah who honored us with Islam and saved us from this myth and ignorance.

Monday, 2 January 2017

Alleged Missing Qur'anic Verse of Rajm (Stoning)

By: Islamic-Life, Bassam Zawadi
In this article, insha'Allah (by the will of Allah), I'll refute the non-Muslims' false allegation of incompletion of the Qur'an and reveal the truth about alleged missing ayah (1) of Rajm (Stoning). They claim: Islamic textual evidence suggests that Allah revealed the ayah of rajm (stoning) to Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) and it is not found in the mushaf (codex) of Qur'an that we have today; thus, the Qur'an is not preserved and incomplete. First, Allah Ta'ala says in the Qur'an that it has been completed (interpretation of the meaning): "this day have I perfected your deen for you" (2) and He says that He will preserve it (interpretation of the meaning): "We have, without doubt sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption)" (3). Second, the entire Qur'an was memorized and written down during the life of Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) and later it was compiled in the form of a book by trustworthy companions (May Allah be pleased with them all) and passed down to us in both forms (written and oral) and how to recite it. Third, it is well known that some ayat of the Qur'an were revealed in the beginning but they were later abrogated and replaced with others or their ruling remained but recitation was abrogated and vice versa. So, it is not enough to prove, from Islamic text, that a certain ayah of the Qur'an was revealed because we do not deny it, as long as there is authentic evidence to prove it. The burden of proof lies on the attackers; they have to prove two things: (1) certain ayah of the Qur'an was revealed (2) and it is suppose to be part of the Qur'an (final recitation). Unfortunately, for the attackers, they can only find the evidence to prove the first case and I fail to see how does this prove that Qur'an is incomplete. Fourth, brother Bassam (May Allah bless him) has already written a very good article (4) to prove the abrogation of this ayah. He has provided lots of Islamic evidences and I'll be using them, insha'Allah.

Evidence for their claim

Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: 'Umar said, "I am afraid that after a long time has passed, people may say, ‘We do not find the Verses of the Rajam (stoning to death) in the Holy Book,' and consequently they may go astray by leaving an obligation that Allah has revealed. Lo! I confirm that the penalty of Rajm be inflicted on him who commits illegal sexual intercourse, if he is already married and the crime is proved by witnesses or pregnancy or confession." Sufyan added, "I have memorized this narration in this way." 'Umar added, "Surely Allah's Apostle carried out the penalty of Rajm, and so did we after him." (5)

Islamic-Life's Response

We learn two things from this narration: (1) the ayah of rajm was revealed and the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessing be upon him) carried the punishment (2) and 'Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) is afraid that the time will come when people will reject the ruling due to absence of the ayah in the Qur'an. Now, let's assume that this ayah was supposed to be part of the Qur'an (final recitation). However, there is a big problem with this assumption because it is well known that the companions of Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings be upon him) spent their whole lives for Islam and they cared about Qur'an and following the Sunnah of Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him). Thus, they wouldn't let Qur'an get corrupted by any means when they had written it down and memorized it during the life of Prophet (peace be upon him). So, I ask and have asked the following question to the attackers: If this ayah was suppose to be part of the final recitation, why 'Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) or one of the other companions did not try to write it in the compiled book form of the Qur'an? The attackers have no answer to this question. In fact, the evidences tell us why 'Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) did not try to add this in the mushaf (codex) of the Qur'an, which was compiled during the time of Abou Bakar (May Allah be pleased him). Now, let us examine the evidences; the translation is summarized version of what it is being said in the Arabic passage:
Imam Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani (May Allah have mercy on him) says: “Reported in Muwatta that 'Umar spoke to people of Medina during the time of pilgrimage (hajj) and said: '...people say we do not find this ruling (ayah of rajam) in the book of Allah. Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) did rajam and so did we. If it was in my hands and not for the people to say 'Umar written/added something in the book of Allah which was not there, I would have written/added in it (ayah of rajam).' ... 'Umar said to people: 'The Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) carried the punishment of rajam and so did we after him. If it were not for people saying 'Umar increased in the book of Allah which was not there, I would have written/added in it (ayah of rajam).'” (6)
Imam Ibn Kathir (May Allah have mercy on him) says: “It is reported in Musnad Ahmad that one day 'Umar said in a sermon: 'People say we do not find the ruling of rajam in the book of Allah; Qur'an only mentions whiping. Remember Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) himself did rajam and we did the same after him. If I were not afraid of people saying 'Umar added/written in the book of Allah which was not there, I would have written/added in it the ayah of rajam the way it was revealed.' This has been also reported in Sunan An-Nasi.” (7)
Thus, the above narrations clearly tell us the reason why the companions (May Allah be pleased with them) abandoned the writing of this ayah in the mushaf of the Qur'an. If something is not supposed to be part of a story, how can you say that the story is incomplete since it is missing that part? Imam Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani (May Allah have mercy on him) further explains us why 'Umar (May Allah be pleased with him) got emotional and wanted this ayah to be written down: "In the verse whose recitation has been abrogated but its ruling remained, and it has happened what Umar feared. A tribe from the Khawarij or most of them and some of the Mu'tazilites rejected the stoning" (8). Now, let us examine more ahadith which will prove that the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) himself disapprove the writing of this ayah:
Imam Ibn Kathir (May Allah have mercy on him) says: “'People were sitting around Merwan and Hadhrat Zaid bin Thabit was also present. He [Zaid] said, ‘we used to recite in the Qur’an that punishment for married adulterer and adulteress is stoning to death’. Merwan asked, ‘So why did you not write this in the Qur’an (mushaf)’? He [Zaid] said listen, ‘when we started talking about this, we went to ‘Umar bin Khtaab and he told us: one man came to Prophet (peace be upon him) and he started talking about the ayah of rajam. Someone from the gathering said that O Allah’s Messenger (peace be upon him) write this ayah down. Prophet (peace be upon him) said that I cannot write it down anymore or something similar/same.’ This hadith has also been recorded in Nasi. Therefore, it is proved from these ahadith that the ayah of rajam was first part of recitation but later its recitation was abrogated but the ruling remained and Allah knows best.” (7)
Imam Ibn Hajar Al-Asqalani (May Allah have mercy on him) says: “Umar said, 'When this verse came down I approached the Prophet (peace be upon him) so I asked him: Should I write it down?' It is as if he hated that' ... Hence, it is proved from these ahadith that the recitation of this ayah was abrogated but the ruling remained.” (6)
Imam Al-Nawawi (May Allah have mercy on him) says: "And this is whose recitation has been abrogated and its ruling remained ... And the companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him) abandoning the writing of this verse is clear evidence that the abrogated should not be written in the Qur'an and that Umar's statement about the stoning as he is on the pulpit and the silence of the companions and other than them from who were present from opposing him is evidence about the ruling of the stoning (still being implemented).” (9)

Conclusion

In conclusion, the evidences are crystal clear and tells us that recitation of the rajam ayah was abrogated but its ruling remained and this is the unanimous opinion of the companions and scholars of Islam as Prophet (peace be upon him) himself disapproved the writing of the ayah but he practiced the ruling. Unfortunately for the attackers, their poor attempt to disapprove the preservation of the Qur'an has been refuted, alhamdulillah (praise to be Allah)! Before I finish, let me completely bury the attackers and their poor arguments against the preservation of the Qur’an. I call this the golden key and irrefutable argument to refute the supposedly missing ayat and parts of the Qur’an:
Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz bin Rufai': Shaddad bin Ma'qil and I entered upon Ibn 'Abbas. Shaddad bin Ma'qil asked him, "Did the Prophet leave anything (any other Qur’an besides this Qur'an)?" He replied. "He did not leave anything (any other revelation) except what is (safe) between the two bindings (of the Qur'an)." Then we visited Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiyya and asked him (the same question). He replied, "The Prophet did not leave (any other revelation) except what is between the bindings (of the Qur'an)." (10)
Imam Wahedi (May Allah have mercy on him) comments on this hadith: “By recording this hadith, Hadhrat Imam Bukhari (May Allah have mercy on him) has rejected the views of those Shias, who say that Qur’an had a verse about Hadhrat Ali (May Allah be pleased with him) being the [first] khalifa and other companions (e.g. ‘Uthman, Abou Bakr, ‘Umar (May Allah be pleased with them all)) didn’t include it in the final compilation of the Qur’an. When Prophet's (peace be upon him) cousin, 'Abdullah Ibn 'Abas and Ali's son Muhammad bin Al-Hanafiyya (May Allah be pleased with them all) didn't know about such tales/stories, then how can these people claim it" (11). Similarly, even if we assume what attackers claim, there are missing ayat and parts of the Qur'an or multiple version of the Qur'an, then how come 'Abdullah Ibn 'Abas (May Allah be pleased with him) was not aware of it? He was one of the two persons who answered the questioner--from later generation--regarding the preservation of the Qur'an! Why didn't he tell the questioner that it has been reported or known that there are missing ayat or parts of the Qur'an or there are different version of the Qur'an? This concludes the refutation, alhamdulillah. Wallahu a'lam (and Allah knows best)

Footnotes:
  1. The arabic word "ayah" is commonly translated into "verse" but I do not think it is correctly translated. So until a better word is found, I'll be using the Arabic word.
  2. Surah Al-Ma'idah, 3, Ayah 3
  3. Surah Al-Hijr, 15, Ayah 9
  4. The Qur'anic Verse on Stoning
  5. Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 8, Book 82, Number 816
  6. Fathul Bari, Commentary on Hadith no. 6327
  7. Tafsir ibn Kathir, Commentary on Surah An-Noor, 24, Ayah 2
  8. Fathul Bari, Commentary on Hadith no. 6328
  9. Sharh Saheeh Muslim, Commentary on Hadith no. 3201
  10. Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 61, Number 537
  11. Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 6, page 545, published by Jami'yat Ahla Hadith of Hind in 2004

Has Qur'an been Preserved?

By: Islamic-Life
This article covers the Muslims response and refutation to some of the common false allegations against the preservation of the Qur'an. These are my notes from a debate that I had with an atheist on the topic of preservation of the Qur'an. He mainly argued that Qur'an was not complete during the life of the Messenger of Allah (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam - peace and blessings be upon him), neither it was completely written down or memorized. He also argued that the Qur'an we've today is missing ayaat (verses) and parts. The preservation of the Qur'an has been guaranteed by Allah (God): "Verily, We, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e. the Qur'an) and surely, We will guard it (from corruption)" (1). Imam ibn Jarir at-Tabari (rahimahullah - May Allah have mercy on him) says in the tafsir (exegesis) of this ayah: "Allah is saying, it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (Reminder), i.e. the Qur'an, and We will guard the Qur'an against anything false being added to it that is not part of it, or anything that is part of it being taken away, whether that has to do with rulings, hudood punishments or matters having to do with inheritance" (2). The sound minded readers can go through my notes and analyze the truth:

Was Qur'an Incomplete when Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salm) died?

Non-Muslim's Argument

Qur'an was not complete when Muhammad died and was in fragments. Qur'an is incomplete because it was not completely compiled, missing parts or some parts didn't survive. If the sayings of the Qur'an was not organised into a book called the Qur'an, there is no Qur'an.

Muslim Response

This misconception is only raised due to lack of basic knowledge. The attacker thinks that when Muslims today say "Qur'an", they refer to the written mushaf (codex), which is not true as no sound minded Muslim believe in such a thing. According to the correct Islamic 'aqeedah (creed), Sunni Muslim believe that the Qur'an is the Kalam (speech) of Allah and it is not created. In addition, the literal meaning of the word Qur'an is, "the recitation". Therefore, when Muslims say "Qur'an", they're talking about the text not the written copies which contain the text. Now, the Qur'an was revealed to Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) over the period of 23 years, it was completed while he was alive. Allah Ta'ala says in the Qur'an: "this day have I perfected your deen for you" (3). Therefore, the Qur'anic revelation was completed when Allah’s Messenger (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) was alive. Even if we assume the attacker's position, if the content of a story is complete, how can you claim that the story is incomplete? The following sahih (authentic) ahadith further confirms it:
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: The Prophet was the most generous person, and he used to become more so (generous) particularly in the month of Ramadan because Gabriel used to meet him every night of the month of Ramadan till it elapsed. Allah's Apostle used to recite the Qur'an for him. When Gabriel met him, he used to become more generous than the fast wind in doing good. (4)
Narrated Abu-Huraira: Gabriel used to repeat the recitation of the Qur'an with the Prophet once a year, but he repeated it twice with him in the year he died. The Prophet used to stay in I'tikaf for ten days every year (in the month of Ramadan). (5)

Didn't Companions (radi-allahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad(sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salm) memorize and write down the whole Qur'an?

Non-Muslim's Argument

No one memorized or wrote down all of Muhammad's teachings. Look at the following hadith: Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: ...So I started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palm-leaf stalks, thin white stones, and also from the men who knew it by heart, till I found the last verse of Surat at-Tauba (repentance) with Abi Khuzaima al-Ansari, and I did not find it with anybody other than him... (6). From this hadith, it is clear that the scribes failed to note down all the Muhammad said, hence why the tale talks about his followers failing to create a book and also why the person needed to search for multiple people, multiple writings to even compile it.

Muslim Response

Again, the attacker shows his lack of basic Islamic knowledge and misinterpretation of the hadith. First, let's look at the proofs which refutes his false claims and then we'll look at this hadith within the context. Shaykh Muhammad Salih al-Munajjid (May Allah preserve him) said:
Everything that was revealed to the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was written down in front of him straight away, and some of the Sahaabah had masaahif (written copies of the Qur'an). After the death of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), the first khaleefah, Abu Bakr al-Siddeeq (may Allaah be pleased with him) gathered the Qur’aan in written and kept it. Then the third khaleefah, 'Uthmaan ibn 'Affaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) compiled it in mus-hafs that were based on the mus-haf compiled by Abu Bakr, in addition to what had been memorized. (7)
and in another place he said:
The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) appointed a group of his companions who were trustworthy and knowledgeable to write down the revelation. They are known in their biographies as those who wrote down the Revelation, such as the four Caliphs, 'Abd-Allaah ibn 'Amr ibn al-'Aas, Mu'aawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan, Zayd ibn Thaabit and others – may Allaah be pleased with them all.(8)

The whole Qur'an was memorized by many companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam)

Let's look at some of the authentic sources which supports what the Shaykh said; Imam Al-Bukhari (rahimahullah - May Allah have mercy on him) records the following hadith in Sahih Al-Buhkhari in chapter, "Who were the Qurra'/hufaz among the companions (radiallahu anhuma - May Allah be pleased with them) of Prophet (peace be upon him)?" Qari'/ hafiz (singular of Qurra'/hufaz) is someone who has memorized the WHOLE QUR’AN!:
Narrated Masriq: 'Abdullah bin 'Amr mentioned 'Abdullah bin Masud and said, "I shall ever love that man, for I heard the Prophet saying, 'take (learn) the Qur'an from four: 'Abdullah bin Masud, Salim, Mu'adh and Ubai bin Ka'b'". (9)
The commenter in the commentary of this hadith says: "These four companions (RA) were the biggest 'ailm (scholar) and the memorizer of the whole Qur'an. There were other qurra' among them but these four knew the most". (10) The phrase, "Knew the most", doesn't refer to the quantity; rather it refers to the strength of their memory. This also proves that companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) perfectly memorized and learned the entire Qur'an. You can't teach others or help them memorize the Qur'an unless you have memorized the entire Qur'an and its 'alim. Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) would never have made such a statement if they were not qualified for it! We further read in 'Al-Itqan fi-ulum al-Qur'an: "Some of the companions who memorized the Quran were: 'Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, Ibn Masud, Abu Huraira, Abdullah bin Abbas, Abdullah bin Amr bin al-As, Aisha, Hafsa, and Umm Salama". (11) Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) has told us of great virtue of memorzing the Qur'an. Muslims for 14 centuries have been memorizing the Qur'an and passing it down as it came. Hence, it is complete nonsensical of one to say that the companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) didn't memorize the whole Qur'an. There are numerous other overwhelming evidences, which I'm not quoting to keep the response short, that confirm the fact that many of the companions (rahiallahu anhuma) memorized the entire Qur'an and the readers will soon see that the very hadith quoted by the attacker proves him wrong.

Statements of non-Muslim Scholars on memorization of the Qur'an

John Burton says: "The method of transmitting the Quran from one generation to the next by having he young memorize the oral recitation of their elders had mitigated somewhat from the beginning the worst perils of relying solely on written records…" (12) Kenneth Cragg says: "this phenomenon of Quranic recital means that the text has traversed the centuries in an unbroken living sequence of devotion. It cannot, therefore, be handled as an antiquarian thing, nor as a historical document out of a distant past. The fact of hifdh (Quranic memorization) has made the Quran a present possession through all the lapse of Muslim time and given it a human currency in every generation, never allowing its relegation to a bare authority for reference alone". (13)

The whole Qur'an was written down by many Companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam)

Let's look some of the authentic evidences proving the fact that the Qur'an was written down by many companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) during his life:
Narrated Qatada: I asked Anas bin Malik: "Who collected the Qur'an at the time of the Prophet ?" He replied, "Four, all of whom were from the Ansar: Ubai bin Ka'b, Mu'adh bin Jabal, Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid. (14)
Narrated Anas bin Malik: When the Prophet died, none had collected the Qur'an but four persons: Abu Ad-Darda'. Mu'adh bin Jabal, Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid. We were the inheritor (of Abu Zaid) as he had no offspring. (15) The commenter in the commentary of this hadith says: "Hadhrat Anas (radhiallahu anho) is saying what he knew. There were other companions (radhiallahu anhuma) besides these four who collected (wrote down) the Qur'an. However, Hadhrat Anas (radhiallahu anho) means the companions who collected (wrote down) the whole Qur'an". (10) Some may argue that the word "collected" could also mean they memorized it or collected knowledge because these ahadith are also recorded in the same chapter as 521. However, the correct translation is that they wrote it down. The Arabic word used here is, Jam'a, and it means literally collecting objects. Therefore, they must have collected Qur'an in written form.
Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: Abu Bakr sent for me and said, "You used to write the Divine Revelations for Allah's Apostle : So you should search for (the Qur'an and collect) it." (16)
Narrated Al-Bara: There was revealed: "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and those who strive and fight in the Cause of Allah" (4.95). The Prophet said, "Call Zaid for me and let him bring the board, the inkpot and the scapula bone (or the scapula bone and the ink pot)."' Then he said, "Write: …" (17)
The entire Quran was however also recorded in writing at the time of revelation from the Prophet's [sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam] dictation, may God praise him, by some of his literate companions, the most prominent of them being Zaid ibn Thabit. (18)
Others among his noble scribes were Ubayy ibn Ka’b, Ibn Mas’ud, Mu’awiyah ibn Abi-Sufyan, Khalid ibn Waleed and Zubayr ibn Awwam. (19)

Explanation of the hadith and reasons for collecting the Qur'an from different people

In the refutation of the attacker's claim, I've above shown using the authentic evidences that the entire Qur'an was memorized and written down during the life of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam). Now, the attacker's false claims only arise due to his misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the hadith: Narrated Zaid bin Thabit: ...So I started looking for the Qur'an and collecting it from (what was written on) palm-leaf stalks, thin white stones, and also from the men who knew it by heart, till I found the last verse of Surat at-Tauba (repentance) with Abi Khuzaima al-Ansari, and I did not find it with anybody other than him... (6). However, when we read the complete hadith it tells us the reasons about their decision of collecting the Qur'an. We read in the hadith that many Qurra' (who memorized the whole Qur’an) martyred during the battle of Yamama. Again, the very hadith quoted by the attacker to prove his point contradicts him and it proves my point: many companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) memorized the entire Qur’an during his life. The battle of Yamama took place right after Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) passed away, in fact, he (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) sent the army himself and later this army was strengthened with more men by Abou Bakr (radiallahu anho). Hence, the companions (rahiallahu anhuma) decided to make a committe which was responsible of collecting the Qur'an and Zaid was incharge of this task.
Imam ibn Hajr al-Asqalani (rahimahullah) says in Fathul Bari: "The material must have been originally written down in the presence of the Prophet; nothing written down later on the basis of memory alone was to be accepted. The material must be confirmed by two witnesses, that is to say, by two trustworthy persons testifying that they themselves had heard the Prophet recite the passage in question". (20) The restrictions placed by the committee are the sole reason for collecting the Qur'an from different people and finding a certain ayah with only one person. In other words, reading the hadith within the context of other evidences, we understand that the phrase in the hadith "other than him" exclude the members of committee as Zaid (radiallahu anho) was collecting the Qur'an from non-members and they needed two trustworthy witnesses to confirm it. Shaykh Muhammad Salih confirms it: "The Sahaabi Zayd ibn Thaabit (may Allaah be pleased with him) knew the Qur’aan by heart but he was methodical in his confirmation; he would not agree to write down any verse until two of the Sahaabah testified that they had heard it from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him)". (8) Imam ibn Hajr further explains this in Fathul Bari:
The Prophet (peace be upon him) permitted the writing of the Qur'an and prohibited the writing of anything else along with it, so Abu Bakr did not order anything to be written down except what has already been written down, and that is the reason why he (Zayd bin Thaabit) refrained from writing the last verses from Surah al Bara'a until he found it written, for he already knew it and had people who remembered it along with him. Umar said: Who ever received anything regarding the Quran from the Prophet (peace be upon him) then let him bring it. And they used to write it on the manuscripts and boards and date palmed stalks. He said that nothing would be accepted from anyone until two witnesses testify to it. "And this points out that Zayd was not satisfied with only finding it written down until someone testified that he heard it, even though Zayd himself had memorized it, and they used to take this extra precaution in order to be more cautious. And Abu Dawud contained a narration on the authority of Hisham bin Arwa that his father said that Abu Bakr said to Umar and Zayd: Sit down on the door of the Mosque and whoever of two witnesses come to you regarding the Quran then write it down'. The men of this narration are trustworthy despite the chain being broken, and the intended meaning regarding two witnesses was memorization and writing, or it meant that they both testify that what was written down was actually written down under the authority of the Messenger peace be upon him, or it meant that they both testify that it was sent down as Quranic revelation. And it was their way that nothing was written down except that they receive what was written down during the time of the Prophet peace be upon him and not just from memorization. (21)
From above evidences, it is clear that Zaid (radiallahu anho) didn't find the ayaat (verses) written down with anyone except Abi Khuzaima (radiallahu anho); however, it doesn't mean that no one else knew about these ayaat beside him. Even if we assume the attacker position, then how did Zaid (radiallahu anho) know that he had to look for these ayaat? How did he know that he will find these ayaat from Abi Khuzaima (radiallahu anho)? How did Zaid (adiallahu anho) confirm that it was part of Sura At-Tauba and Abi Khuzaima (radiallahu anho) was mentioning those two specific ayaat? Even, if we assume that Abi Khuzaima (radiallahu anho) told him this then the committee would never have taken this into account because this would nullifies their basic premise for verifying the correct collection of the Qur'an (only one source). To hit the nail to the ground, we read Tafsir ibn Kathir in which Imam ibn Kathir (rahimahullah) summed it all up:
And Ahmad said: Ali bin Bahr said that Ali bin Muhammad bin Salma on the authority of Muhammad ibn Ishaq on the authority of Yahya bin Ebad on the authority of his father Ebad bin Zubayr may Allah be pleased with him said that Al Harith (Zayd) approached bin Khuzaymah with these two verses from the ending of Surah Al Bara'a (Surah 9) 'Verily there has come unto you an Apostle (Muhammad) from amongst yourselves' to Abdullah ibn Umar Al Khattab so he said 'Who is with you on this?' He said 'I don't know' and by Allah I testify that I heard it from the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him and I learned it and memorized it then Umar said: And I testify that I heard it from the Messenger of Allah peace be upon him. (22)
Therefore, it is clear from the above evidences that other than Abi Khuzaima (radiallahu anho), other companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam) indeed knew about these ayaat. A more detailed Muslim response to attacker's claim can be found here.

Is Qur'an Incomplete (missing ayaat/parts)?

Non-Muslim's Argument

Many passages of the Qur'an were lost as it is related by the following narration: "Zuhri reports, 'We have heard that many Qur'an passages were revealed but that those who had memorised them fell in the Yemama fighting. Those passages had not been written down, and following the deaths of those who knew them, were no longer known; nor had Abu Bakr, nor 'Umar nor 'Uthman as yet collected the texts of the Qur'an. Those lost passages were not to be found with anyone after the deaths of those who had memorised them. This, I understand, was one of the considerations which impelled them to pursue the Qur'an during the reign of Abu Bakr, committing it to sheets for fear that there should perish in further theatres of war men who bore much of the Qur'an which they would take to the grave with them on their fall, and which, with their passing, would not be found with any other" [-bu Bakr 'Abdullah b. abi Da'ud, "K. al Masahif"]

Muslim Response

First, it is well known that "al Masahif" by 'Abdullah bin abi Da'ud is full of fabricated narrations. Hence, there's no point of refuting the claim if it is not authentic. It is well known and reported by Islamic scholars that if it weren't for the isnaad (chain of narrators/transmitters), the people would had come up anything they wanted and inculded it in Islam. Thus, I ask the attacker where is the isnaad of this narration? I'm assuming that Zhuri mentioned in the narration is Imam Muhammad ibn Muslim ibn 'Ubaydullah ibn Shihab al-Zuhri (rahimahullah). I say this is a lie attributed to a great Sunni Imam and muhadith (scholar of hadith) as the narrations goes against the well known authentic ahadith reported in Sahih al-Bukhari. It has been proved earlier that there were many companions (radiallahu anhuma) of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam), who memorised and wrote down the entire Qur'an, but we read few names from authentic ahadith (9) (14) (15): 'Abdullah bin Masud, Salim, Mu'adh bin Jabal, Ubai bin Ka'b, Abu Ad-Darda', Zaid bin Thabit and Abu Zaid.
Among these people, Ubai bin Ka'b (radiallahu anho) and 'Abdullah bin Masud (radiallahu anho) passed away during the caliphate of 'Uthman (radiallahu anho). Mu'adh bin Jabal (radiallahu anho) passed away during the caliphate of 'Umar (radiallahu anho). Zaid bin Thabit (radiallahu anho) and Abu Ad-Darda' (radiallahu anho) passed away during/after the caliphate of 'Uthman (radiallahu anho). Salim (radiallahu anho) was martyred during the battle of Yamama. I could not trace down some info about Abou Zaid (radiallahu anho). Therefore, out of seven people, who are proven from authentic ahadith that they memorised and/or wrote down the entire Qur’an, only one of them was martyred during the battle of Yamama; hence, the report/rumour that is either attributed to Imam Zahri (rahimahullah) or he heard is false and an utter lie.

Non-Muslim's Argument

Quran is incomplete as relayed by the earliest Muslims: "It is reported from Ismail ibn Ibrahim from Ayyub from Naafi from Ibn Umar who said: "Let none of you say 'I have acquired the whole of the Qur'an'. How does he know what all of it is when much of the Qur'an has disappeared? Rather let him say 'I have acquired what has survived.'" [as-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.524].

Muslim Response

If we read this report, from Ibn 'Umar (radiallahu anho), in the context and the correct translation of it, we understand that he is talking about understanding of the Qur'an not compilation or completion of the Qur'an as the attacker claims! Dr. G.F. Hadad says:
The words used by Ibn 'Umar for the terms given as "acquired," "disappeared," and "what has survived" above were -- I am quoting from memory -- respectively "ahattu" (I have encompassed), "faatahu" (escapes him), and "ma tayassara minhu" (whatever amount of it has been facilitated). The actual meaning of Ibn 'Umar's words is: "Let no one say: I have encompassed the whole of the Qur'an [= its meanings]. How does he know what all of it is when much of the Qur'an escapes him? Rather, let him say: I have encompassed whatever amount of it has been facilitated [for me to know]". Ibn `Umar was famous for his strictness in refraining from interpreting the Qur'an, even criticizing Ibn 'Abbas's interpretive zeal in the beginning, then accepting its authority. He was not referring to the collection of the Qur'an! But only to the ethics of the exegete, in the same line as Ibn 'Abbas's saying narrated by al-Tabari and cited by al-Suyuti and al-Zarkashi: 'There are ambiguous verses in the Qur'an which no one knows besides Allah. Whoever claims that he knows them, is a liar.' (23)

Non-Muslim's Argument

Different version of the Qur'an were destroyed: Hudhaifa was afraid of their (the people of Sha'm and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur'an, so he said to Uthman, 'O Chief of the Believers! Save this nation before they differ about the Book (Qur'an) as Jews and the Christians did before'. So Uthman sent a message to Hafsa, saying, 'Send us the manuscripts of the Qur'an so that we may compile the Qur'anic materials in perfect copies and return the manuscripts to you'. Hafsa sent It to Uthman. Uthman then ordered Zaid ibn Thabit, Abdullah bin az-Zubair, Sa'id bin al-As, and Abdur-Rahman bin Harith bin Hisham to rewrite the manuscripts in perfect copies. Uthman said to the three Quraishi men, 'In case you disagree with Zaid bin Thabit on any point in the Qur'an, then write it in the dialect of the Quraish as the Qur'an was revealed in their tongue'. They did so, and when they had written many copies, Uthman returned the original manuscripts to Hafsa. Uthman sent to every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied, and ordered that all the other Qur'anic materials, whether written in fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies, be burnt. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, p.479).

Muslim Response

Qur'an was originally revealed in the dialect of Quraish but later was allowed to recited/read in seven different ways: Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Abbas: Allah's Apostle said, "Gabriel recited the Qur'an to me in one way. Then I requested him (to read it in another way), and continued asking him to recite it in other ways, and he recited it in several ways till he ultimately recited it in seven different ways. (24) Hence, various readings among people from different tribes/nations became obvious and we also make a note of this from the hadith, which the attacker quoted, that they were afraid of disputes raising among people. As a result, 'Utman (radiallahu anho) set a committee to prepare a final copy of the Qur'an from the copy that Abou Bkar (radiallahu anho) left with the wife of Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam), Hafsa (radiallahu anha - May Allah be pleased with her). He also ordered to write down the Qur'an in Quraish dialect and burned the other copies to resolve any uncertainty, discrepancies and errors in terms of textual or reading variants. Shaykh Muhammad Salih briefly explains the reasons for uniting upon one recitation:
This Mus-haf (written copy of the Qur’aan) remained in the hands of the caliphs until the time of the Rightly-Guided Caliph ‘Uthmaan ibn ‘Affaan (may Allaah be pleased with him). The Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them) had dispersed to different lands, and they used to recite the Qur’aan according to what they had heard of the seven recitations from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), and each of their students used to recite according to what he had heard from his shaykh. If a student heard someone reciting in a manner different from what he knew, he would denounce him and accuse him of making a mistake, and this went on until the Sahaabah feared that there would be fitnah (trouble) between the Taabi’een and successive generations. So they thought that they should unite the people in following one recitation, which was in the dialect of Quraysh in which the Qur’aan had first been revealed, so as to dispel any disputes and resolve the matter. ‘Uthmaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) was consulted, and he agreed with this opinion. 
Al-Bukhaari narrated in his Saheeh (4988) from Anas ibn Maalik that Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamaan came to ‘Uthmaan at the time when the people of Shaam (Syria) and the people of Iraq were waging war to conquer Armenia and Azerbaijan. Hudhayfah was alarmed by their (the people of Sham and Iraq) differences in the recitation of the Qur’aan, so he said to 'Uthmaan, "O Ameer al-Mu’mineen! Save this nation before they dispute about the Book (Qur’aan) as the Jews and the Christians did before." So 'Uthmaan sent a message to Hafsah saying, "Send us the manuscript of the Qur’aan so that we may make copies of the Mus-haf and we will return the manuscript to you." (8)
We also read:
The earlier recension (Original copy prepared by Abu Bakr) was to serve as the principal basis of the new one. (25)
Any doubt that might be raised as to the phrasing of a particular passage in the written text was to be dispelled by summoning persons known to have learned the passage in question from the Prophet. 'Uthman himself was to supervise the work of the Council. (26)
It is well known that when the final recension was completed, 'Uthman (radiallahu anho) sent a copy of it to each of the major cities of Makka, Damascus, Kufa, Basra and Madina. The action of 'Uthman (radiallahu anho) to burn the other copies besides the final recension, though obviously drastic, was for the betterment and harmony of the whole community and was unanimously approved by the Companions of the Prophet as Zaid ibn Thabit (radiallahu anho) is reported to have said: "I saw the Companions of Muhammad (going about) saying, 'By God, Uthman has done well! By God, Uthman has done well!". (27)

Non-Muslim's Argument

Editing of the Qur'an is allowed as it is reported in a hadith: Uthman called Zaid bin Thabit, Abdullah bin az-Zubair, Sa'id bin Al-'As and 'Abdur-Rahman bin Al-Harith bin Hisham, and then they wrote the manuscripts (of the Qur'an). 'Uthman said to the three Quraishi persons, "If you differ with Zaid bin Thabit on any point of the Qur'an, then write it in the language of Quraish, as the Qur'an was revealed in their language". So they acted accordingly. [Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol.4, p.466]

Muslim Response

So, what exactly did they edit? As I showed above that Qur'an was originally revealed in Quraish dialect but later was allowed to be recited/read in seven different dialects. I don't know by which logic using one of the seven dialects is considered editing!

Non-Muslim's Argument

There have been changes to the Qu'ran as Zaid has been reported to said: "I missed a verse from al-Ahzab (Surah 33) when we transcribed the mushaf (the written text of the Qur'an under Uthman's supervision). I used to hear the messenger of Allah (saw) reciting it. We searched for it and found it with Khuzaimah ibn Thabit al-Ansari: 'From among the believers are men who are faithful in their covenant with Allah' (33.23). So we inserted it in the (relevant) surah in the text." [As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Qur'an, p.138]

Muslim Response

Again, the attacker mixed up the completion of the Qur'an with compilation of the Qur'an. Does the attacker's source say that they came up with this ayah and added it to the completed Qur'an? All it is saying that when they were compiling the Qur'an under the supervision of 'Uthman (radiallahou anho), one of the companion (radiallahu anho) forgot an ayah but he knew that he (radiallahu anho) heard it from Prophet Muhammad (sal-allahu 'alayhi wa salam); so, he (radiallahu anho) got it from another companion (radiallahu anho) and added it in where it belonged! Therefore, I don't see how this is changing the Qur'an. The argument of edition of the Qur'an would make sense if they (radiallahu anhuma) created or removed an ayah which was not part of the Qur'an, but there is ZERO evidence for that. I already have showed above that Qur'an was perfectly compiled and the same Qur'an exist today as it has been perfectly passed down for 1400 years.

Non-Muslim's Argument

An example of a missing verse, Verse of Stoning; One of the missing verses is the verse of stoning, where an adulterer would be stoned to death as punishment: "Allah sent Muhammad (saw) with the Truth and revealed the Holy Book to him, and among what Allah revealed, was the Verse of the Rajam (the stoning of married persons, male and female, who commit adultery) and we did recite this Verse and understood and memorized it. Allah's Apostle (saw) did carry out the punishment of stoning and so did we after him. I am afraid that after a long time has passed, somebody will say, 'By Allah, we do not find the Verse of the Rajam in Allah's Book', and thus they will go astray by leaving an obligation which Allah has revealed." [Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 8, p.539]

Muslim Response

This has been already dealt here in details. It is important to note that there are other cases like the rajam (stoning) ayah. Other Islamic sources prove that certain ayaat were revealed but they were later abrogated; hence, not found in the Qur'an. However, the attackers quote the narrations which prove that certain ayaat were revealed but either deliberately misses out the narrations which say that those ayaat were abrogated or misinterpret them. For example, the case of missing part of 2:238, which has been dealt here in details. With this, I would like to conclude that in this article, I've shown many authentic evidences to disapprove and refute the common false allegations made against the authenticity and preservation of the Qur'an. For more information on this topic and Muslims refutations/responses to suspicious arguments raised by Islamic haters, the readers can refer to Qur'anic Variants and Qur'an. Wallahu a'lam (and Allah knows best)!

Footnotes:
  1. Surah Al-Hijr (15) Ayah 9 - interpretation of the meaning
  2. Surah Al-Hijr - The Tafsirs
  3. Surah Al-Ma'idah (5) Ayah 3 - interpretation of the meaning
  4. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 509
  5. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 519
  6. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 520
  7. Is it true that there is no evidence of a Qur'an being written in the 7th century?
  8. Who wrote the Qur'an and how was it put together?
  9. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 521
  10. Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 6, page 527-528, published by Jami'yat Ahla Hadith of Hind in 2004
  11. 'Al-Itqan fi-ulum al-Qur'an, Vol. I, p. 124.
  12. An Introduction to the Hadith, Edinburgh University Press: 1994, p. 27.
  13. The Mind of the Quran, London: George Allen & Unwin, 1973, p.26.
  14. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 525
  15. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 526
  16. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 511
  17. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 512
  18. Al-Itqan fee ‘Uloom al-Quran, Vol.1, p.41 & 99.
  19. Al-Isabah fee Taymeez as-Sahabah, p.53-63
  20. Fathul Bari, Vol. IX, p. 10-11.
  21. Fathul Bari, Kitab: Fadaa'il Al Qur'aan, Bab: Jami' Al Qur'aan, Commentary on Hadith no. 4603
  22. Tafsir of Ibn Kathir, Commentary on Surah 9:129
  23. COMPANION MEMORIZERS OF QUR'AN
  24. Sahih al-Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 661, Number 513
  25. Ibn Hajar, Bath, IX, p. 15
  26. 'Al-Itqan fi-ulum al-Qur'an, Vol. I, p. 59
  27. Naysaburi, al-Nizam al-Din al-Hasan ibn Muhammad, Ghara'ib al-Quran wa-ragha'ib al-furqan, 4 vols., to date. Cairo, 1962.